We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES AG

Download Mobile App




Blood Test Distinguishes between Forms of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 13 May 2019
A recently developed blood test distinguishes between mild and severe forms of inflammatory bowel disease and is potentially a step towards realizing personalized therapy for the syndrome.

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, collectively referred to as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are chronic conditions that involve inflammation of the gut. More...
Investigators at the University of Cambridge (United Kingdom) had previously described a prognostic transcriptional signature in CD8 T-cells that separated patients with IBD into two phenotypically distinct subgroups, termed IBD1 and IBD2. The IBD1 subgroup experienced significantly more aggressive disease and demonstrated poorer prognosis than IBD2 patients.

In the current study, the investigators sought to develop a blood-based test that could identify these subgroups without cell separation and be suitable for clinical use. To this end, they used a combination of machine learning and the qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction) whole blood assay to identify genetic signatures in a cohort of 69 Crohn's disease patients that re-created the two subgroups from their previous study. The signatures were then validated in 123 IBD patients. Results indicated that the new test was 90-100% accurate in correctly identifying patients with the milder IBD2 form of the disease.

"IBD can be a very debilitating disease, but this new test could help us transform treatment options, moving away from a "one size fits all" approach to a personalized approach to treating patients," said senior author Dr. Kenneth G. C. Smith, professor of medicine at the University of Cambridge.

Further development of the test is being carried out by the spinout company PredictImmune (Cambridge, United Kingdom).

The IBD blood test was described in the April 27, 2019, online edition of the journal Gut.

Related Links:
University of Cambridge
PredictImmune


Gold Member
Quantitative POC Immunoassay Analyzer
EASY READER+
Gold Member
Hybrid Pipette
SWITCH
Human Estradiol Assay
Human Estradiol CLIA Kit
HBV DNA Test
GENERIC HBV VIRAL LOAD VER 2.0
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Hematology

view channel
Image: Research has linked platelet aggregation in midlife blood samples to early brain markers of Alzheimer’s (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

Platelet Activity Blood Test in Middle Age Could Identify Early Alzheimer’s Risk

Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease remains one of the biggest unmet needs in neurology, particularly because the biological changes underlying the disorder begin decades before memory symptoms appear.... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The SMART-ID Assay delivers broad pathogen detection without the need for culture (Photo courtesy of Scanogen)

Rapid Assay Identifies Bloodstream Infection Pathogens Directly from Patient Samples

Bloodstream infections in sepsis progress quickly and demand rapid, precise diagnosis. Current blood-culture methods often take one to five days to identify the pathogen, leaving clinicians to treat blindly... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.