We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Drug Causes Missed Diagnosis of Protein S Deficiency

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 01 Jan 2018
Rivaroxaban is a direct, antithrombin-independent factor Xa inhibitor, which inhibits not only free factor Xa, but also clot-bound factor Xa and the prothrombinase complex. More...
It is used for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism, as well as for prophylaxis of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Many patients taking rivaroxaban undergo hypercoagulation testing to rule out common inherited or acquired causes of hypercoagulability, including assays for activated protein C resistance (APCR) to detect factor V Leiden (FVL), and tests for protein S deficiency. However, it has been reported that spiking normal plasma with rivaroxaban caused an artefactual increase in the APCR ratio.

Scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA) compared of 60 patients in four different groups: FVL heterozygous (FVL-HET)/taking rivaroxaban, wild-type/taking rivaroxaban, FVL-HET/no rivaroxaban, and normal APCR/no rivaroxaban, and 32 patients taking rivaroxaban were tested for protein S functional activity and free antigen.

The patients were evaluated using the standard FVL testing protocol: an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based APCR assay with dilution in factor V–deficient plasma on a Star Evolution analyzer and an FVL DNA assay. Protein S functional activity was measured using the Stago STACLOT Protein S assay on a Star Evolution analyzer, and free protein S antigen was measured using the Stago Asserachrom Free Protein S.

The team found that the FVL-HET patients taking rivaroxaban had lower APCR ratios than wild-type patients. For FVL-HET patients taking rivaroxaban, mean APCR was 1.75 ± 0.12, versus 1.64 ± 0.3 in FVL-HET patients not taking rivaroxaban. Activated protein C resistance in FVL-HET patients fell well below the cutoff of 2.2 at which the laboratory reflexes FVL DNA testing. No cases of FVL were missed despite rivaroxaban, but in contrast, rivaroxaban falsely elevated functional protein S activity, regardless of the presence or absence of FVL. A total of 4/32 patients (12.5%) had low free protein S antigen (range, 58%–67%), whereas their functional protein S activity appeared normal (range 75%–130%).

The authors concluded that despite rivaroxaban treatment, APCR testing can distinguish FVL-HET from normal patients, rendering indiscriminate FVL DNA testing of all patients on rivaroxaban unnecessary. Free protein S should be tested in patients taking rivaroxaban to exclude hereditary protein S deficiency. The study was published in January 2018 in the journal Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

Related Links:
Massachusetts General Hospital


Gold Member
Cardiovascular Risk Test
Metabolic Syndrome Array I & II
Collection and Transport System
PurSafe Plus®
Sample Transportation System
Tempus1800 Necto
Blood Glucose Test Strip
AutoSense Test
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Immunology

view channel
Image: When assessing the same lung biopsy sample, research shows that only 18% of pathologists will agree on a TCMR diagnosis (Photo courtesy of Thermo Fisher)

Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System Assesses Lung Transplant Rejection

Lung transplant recipients face a significant risk of rejection and often require routine biopsies to monitor graft health, yet assessing the same biopsy sample can be highly inconsistent among pathologists.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.