We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




POC Testing Evaluated for Fecal Calprotectin

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 12 Feb 2018
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are the two most prevalent forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with the highest prevalence and incidence in Europe and North America.

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is widely used to monitor the activity of IBD and to tailor medical treatment to disease activity. More...
Laboratory testing of fecal samples may have a turnaround time of 1–2 weeks, whereas FC home testing allows results within hours and thus enables a rapid response to clinical deterioration.

Clinical biochemists working at Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre (Hvidovre, Denmark) and their colleagues analyzed 55 stool samples. All stool samples were collected in plastic tubes by the patients and sent in by ordinary mail. The samples were immediately frozen at −20 °C upon receipt and analyzed within 1–2 days. The team investigated the correlation between FC measured by the BÜHLMANN home test kit, IBDoc and BÜHLMANN immunoturbidimetric method fCAL turbo assay on a Roche Cobas 6000 c501.

The 55 samples included in the study, covered the clinically relevant concentrations in the range 38 µg/g to 796 µg/g (BÜHLMANN fCal turbo). The team found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.887 between FC measured on IBDoc and the laboratory assay BÜHLMANN fCAL turbo. Ten extractions of three fecal samples with low (< 50 µg/g), medium (50–200 µg/g) and high (> 200 µg/g) FC concentrations were performed in each assay, showing an intermediate imprecision in the range of 2.3%–5.5% (BÜHLMANN fCAL® turbo) and in the range of 4.8%–26.6% (IBDoc).

The authors concluded that that IBDoc is a suitable alternative for the assessment of disease activity in IBD patients. Point of care testing would reduce the turnaround time significantly and potentially improve the quality of treatment by enabling rapid responses to relapses. In addition, home testing may be the only viable alternative in situations where visits to outpatient clinics are difficult or mailing is precluded because of the poor stability of FC. The study will be published in the March 2018 issue of the journal Practical Laboratory Medicine.

Related Links:
Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre


Gold Member
Quality Control Material
iPLEX Pro Exome QC Panel
Portable Electronic Pipette
Mini 96
Gold Member
Cardiovascular Risk Test
Metabolic Syndrome Array I & II
Pipette
Accumax Smart Series
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Hematology

view channel
Image: New evidence shows viscoelastic testing can improve assessment of blood clotting during postpartum hemorrhage (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Viscoelastic Testing Could Improve Treatment of Maternal Hemorrhage

Postpartum hemorrhage, severe bleeding after childbirth, remains one of the leading causes of maternal mortality worldwide, yet many of these deaths are preventable. Standard care can be hindered by delays... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: When assessing the same lung biopsy sample, research shows that only 18% of pathologists will agree on a TCMR diagnosis (Photo courtesy of Thermo Fisher)

Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System Assesses Lung Transplant Rejection

Lung transplant recipients face a significant risk of rejection and often require routine biopsies to monitor graft health, yet assessing the same biopsy sample can be highly inconsistent among pathologists.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.