We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Technopath Clinical Diagnostics - An LGC Company

Download Mobile App




New Technique Predicts Preterm Births in High Risk Women

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 14 Aug 2020
Print article
Typical GC-IMS output of a vaginal swab. Red spots indicate individual chemicals and machine learning identifies which of these chemicals hold discriminatory information (Photo courtesy of the University of Warwick).
Typical GC-IMS output of a vaginal swab. Red spots indicate individual chemicals and machine learning identifies which of these chemicals hold discriminatory information (Photo courtesy of the University of Warwick).
Globally, preterm birth is the leading cause of death in children under 5 years with 15 million babies being born before 37 weeks’ gestation each year. Spontaneous preterm birth is a syndrome, which can be precipitated by a variety of factors.

The association between bacterial vaginosis (BV) detected using laboratory techniques and preterm labor has been recognized for many years. Its presence, detected in early pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of preterm labor. However, treatment of BV with antibiotics has not been demonstrated to prevent preterm birth.

Gynecologists and Bioengineers at the Warwick University (Coventry, UK) carried out a prospective observational cohort of repeated sampling of 216 patients between 10 to 29 weeks of pregnancy (total 493 sets of swabs were taken, with at least two swabs per patient), from women attending the high-risk preterm prevention clinic at a tertiary level teaching hospital from January 2017-August 2018. The team initially analyzed volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present in the vagina for a condition called bacterial vaginosis, in which the bacteria of the vagina have become imbalanced. Vaginal swabs were taken during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and the outcome of all pregnancies followed up.

The technology they used works by separating the vapor molecules by combining two techniques that first pre-separates molecules based on their reaction with a stationary phase coating (a gas-chromatograph), followed by measuring their mobility in a high-electric field (an Ion Mobility Spectrometer). The odors/VOCs emanating from the samples were analyzed using a GC-IMS instrument (G.A.S., Dortmund, Germany), which is based on Gas Chromatograph – Ion Mobility Spectrometry principles (GC-IMS). Using machine learning techniques, the team 'trained' the technology to spot patterns of VOCs that were signs of bacterial vaginosis.

The team reported that VOC analysis of vaginal swabs, taken in the mid-trimester, is a fair test (AUC 0.79) for preterm prediction, with a sensitivity of 0.66 (95%CI 0.56–0.75) and specificity 0.89 (95%CI 0.82–0.94). Using vaginal swabs taken closest to delivery, VOC analysis is a good test (AUC 0.84) for the prediction of preterm birth with a sensitivity of 0.73 (95%CI 0.64–0.81) and specificity of 0.90 (95%CI 0.82–0.95).

Lauren Lacey, MD, an associate professor and lead author of the study, said, “We've demonstrated that the technology has good diagnostic accuracy, and in the future it could form part of a care pathway to determine who would deliver preterm. VOC technology is really interesting because it reflects both the microbiome and the host response, whereas other technologies look for a specific biomarker. It's the beginning of looking at the association of VOCs with preterm delivery. We want to develop this and look at whether these patterns could be implemented into a care pathway.”

The authors concluded that this novel work has demonstrated that VOC analysis has the potential to be used as a predictive tool to support the prediction of preterm birth and aid personalized prevention strategies. The study was published on July 22, 2020 in the journal Scientific Reports.

Related Links:

Warwick University
G.A.S Dortmund
New
Gold Supplier
Automatic Western Blot Analyzer
Tenfly Phoenix Blot Analyzer
New
Whole Blood Control
ESR-Chex Plus
New
Data Management Software
DataSite
New
STI Test Kit
PlexPCR HSV-1&2, VZV

Print article
IIR Middle East

Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: Metabolomic profiling reveals risk of multiple diseases all at once (Photo courtesy of BIH)

Single Blood Test Predicts Risk of Multiple Diseases Simultaneously Using AI

Prevention is better than cure. To prevent diseases from occurring in the first place, it is important to identify those individuals who are at particularly high risk as early as possible.... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: OneDraw Blood Collection Device significantly reduces obstacles for drawing blood (Photo courtesy of Drawbridge Health)

Near Pain-Free Blood Collection Technology Enables High-Quality Testing

Blood tests help doctors diagnose diseases and conditions such as cancer, diabetes, anemia, and coronary heart disease, as well as evaluate organ functionality. They can also be used to identify disease... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: The MC-80 digital cell morphology analyzer can screen and diagnose malignant and non-malignant blood diseases (Photo courtesy of Mindray)

Mindray Showcases Hematology Innovations at ISLH 2022

Mindray (Shenzhen, China) showcased its hematology innovations and academic achievements to medical experts from Europe and around the world at the International Symposium on Technological Innovations... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2022 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.