We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App


ATTENTION: Due to the COVID-19 PANDEMIC, many events are being rescheduled for a later date, converted into virtual venues, or altogether cancelled. Please check with the event organizer or website prior to planning for any forthcoming event.

New Tool Assesses Cost of ctDNA Testing

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 22 Nov 2022
Print article
Image: The developed micro-costing framework. cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA (Photo courtesy of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers)
Image: The developed micro-costing framework. cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA (Photo courtesy of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers)

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising new biomarker with multiple potential applications in cancer care. Estimating total cost of ctDNA testing is necessary for reimbursement and implementation, but challenging because of variations in workflow.

Recent proof-of-concept studies have demonstrated the diagnostic potential of the analysis of circulating tumor-derived DNA fragments as a tumor biomarker supporting clinical decision making. These ctDNA fragments can be analyzed using liquid biopsy approaches in blood plasma and urine among others.

Medical Scientists from the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) developed a framework that provides a consistent total cost calculation for ctDNA testing across different diagnostic workflows and platforms, including aspects such as personnel, materials, overhead, and failures, while taking test volume into account. The framework's developers also provide an open-access tool to allow for laboratory-specific calculations to explore the total costs of ctDNA testing-specific workflow parameters.

The diagnostic workflow for ctDNA testing was mapped in interactive discussions with experts, including specialists in laboratory medicine, clinical molecular biologists, pathologists, clinical scientists in molecular pathology, laboratory technicians, and ctDNA specialists, starting from blood sample collection to diagnostic test result. A micro-costing approach was used for cost calculation to ensure that the actual resources utilized and the unit costs of those resources are included in the cost calculations. The approach in the cost calculation tool was based on the activity-based costing method. According to the activity-based costing method, cost objects consume activities, and activities consume costs.

The team reported the total costs per sample decrease as the testing volume increases. Therefore, the total costs per sample are reported for a testing volume of one up to the maximum testing volume of the platforms. The maximum testing volume varies between case studies. For the case study Digital Droplet PCR, the costs ranged from USD 199 to USD 1,420, with a maximum testing volume (i.e., 200 samples per week for this case study) to one sample per week. For the case study Real-Time PCR 1, the total per sample costs ranged from USD 761 to USD 1,873 (for 150 samples to one sample per week). For the case study Real-Time PCR 2, the costs ranged from USD 564 to USD 1,148 (for 20 samples to one sample per week). For the case study Mass Spectrometry, the costs ranged from USD 481 to USD 2,630 (for 28 samples to one sample per week). For the case study Commercial NGS Panel, the costs ranged from USD 1,683 to USD 8,399) (for 32 samples to one sample per week). For the case study Custom NGS Panel, the costs ranged from USD 592 to USD 9,124) (for 96 samples to one sample per week).

The authors concluded that they have developed an adaptable micro-costing framework and accompanying open access tool that allows users to explore the total costs of ctDNA analysis per sample, from sample collection to the diagnostic test result, of different diagnostic workflows. The study was published on Nov 16, 2022 in the Journal of Molecular Diagnostics.

Related Links:
Amsterdam University Medical Centers 

Gold Supplier
Real-Time PCR System
Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 7 Pro Dx
Gold Supplier
Blood Glucose Reference Analyzer
Nova Primary
Clinical Centrifuge
3-Field Fecal Test

Print article


Clinical Chem.

view channel
Image: Equivalence of Genetically Elevated LDL and Lipoprotein(a) on Myocardial Infarction (Photo courtesy of Viborg Regional Hospital)

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients With ACD Have Elevated Lipoprotein(a)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by high cholesterol levels, specifically very high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol), in the blood and early cardiovascular... Read more


view channel
Image: Ring-form trophozoites of Plasmodium vivax in a thin blood smear (Photo courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

Immune Regulators Predict Severity of Plasmodium vivax Malaria

Cytokines and chemokines are immune response molecules that display diverse functions, such as inflammation and immune regulation. In Plasmodium vivax infections, the uncontrolled production of these molecules... Read more


view channel
Image: Breast cancer spread uncovered by new molecular microscopy (Photo courtesy of Wellcome Sanger Institute)

New Molecular Microscopy Tool Uncovers Breast Cancer Spread

Breast cancer commonly starts when cells start to grow uncontrollably, often due to mutations in the cells. Overtime the tumor becomes a patchwork of cells, called cancer clones, each with different mutations.... Read more


view channel
Image: With Cell IDx’s acquisition, Leica Biosystems will be moving its multiplexing menu forward (Photo courtesy of Leica Biosystems)

Leica Biosystems Acquires Cell IDx, Expanding Offerings in Multiplexed Tissue Profiling

Leica Biosystems, a technology leader in automated staining and brightfield and fluorescent imaging (Nussloch, Germany), has acquired Cell IDx, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA), which provides multiplex staining... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2022 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.