We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
LGC Clinical Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Events

09 Apr 2024 - 12 Apr 2024
15 Apr 2024 - 17 Apr 2024
23 Apr 2024 - 26 Apr 2024

Several Genes Linked to Long QT Syndrome Reappraised

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 20 Feb 2020
Print article
Image: Normal electrocardiogram (ECG) and an ECG showing QT interval prolongation (long QT syndrome). The P wave represents atrial depolarization; the QRS complex, ventricular depolarization; and the T wave, ventricular repolarization. The QT interval is measured from the beginning of the QRS complex to the return of the T wave to the isoelectric line (Photo courtesy of Mayo Clinic).
Image: Normal electrocardiogram (ECG) and an ECG showing QT interval prolongation (long QT syndrome). The P wave represents atrial depolarization; the QRS complex, ventricular depolarization; and the T wave, ventricular repolarization. The QT interval is measured from the beginning of the QRS complex to the return of the T wave to the isoelectric line (Photo courtesy of Mayo Clinic).
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is the first described and most common inherited arrhythmia. Over the last 25 years, multiple genes have been reported to cause this condition and are routinely tested in patients.

It is now known that that some variants that were thought to be rare are in fact common in populations, and that rare genetic variants are collectively extremely common, with the majority of rare variants not causative for Mendelian disease. Because of dramatic changes in our understanding of human genetic variation, reappraisal of reported genetic causes for LQTS is required.

A large team of scientists led by those at the Toronto General Hospital Research Institute (Toronto, ON, Canada) divided into three gene curation teams who independently assessed each of the 17 genes associated with long QT syndrome to classify the evidence linking them to the disease as either definitive, strong, moderate, or limited. A panel convened by the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has now re-examined the evidence linking these genes to long QT syndrome.

The investigators found that only three of the 17 genes have strong evidence for their connection to the common form of the condition and four genes had evidence linking them to atypical long QT syndrome. According to the authors, many of the other genes should not be considered when pursuing genetic testing for long QT syndrome because of their tenuous link to the disease.

The three genes, KCNQ1, KCNH2 and SCN5A, were classified as having definitive evidence linking them to typical long QT syndrome, as their association was supported by linkage analyses in multiple families, as well as genetic and experimental evidence. Four other genes, CALM1, CALM2, CALM3, and TRDN, had definitive or strong evidence linking them to atypical forms of long QT syndrome, such as ones that present in early childhood, often alongside other symptoms such as seizures and developmental delay.

The evidence linking six genes to long QT syndrome was classified as disputed. For four of these genes, the publications linking them to the condition described candidate gene approaches that the curation teams gave less weight, while the evidence linking the other two genes came from linkage analyses in large families that the scientists said had significant limitations.

Michael Gollob, MD, FRCP. an Associate Professor of Cardiology and senior author of the study, said, “Our study highlights the need to take a step back and to critically evaluate the level of evidence for all reported gene-disease associations, especially when applying genetic testing for diagnostic purposes in our patients. Testing genes with insufficient evidence to support disease causation only creates a risk of inappropriately interpreting the genetic information and leading to patient harm.” The study was published on January 27, 2020 in the journal Circulation.

Related Links:
Toronto General Hospital Research Institute

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
One Step HbA1c Measuring System
GREENCARE A1c
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Test
GPP-100 Anti-CCP Kit
New
Gold Member
Plasma Control
Plasma Control Level 1

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The low-cost portable device rapidly identifies chemotherapy patients at risk of sepsis (Photo courtesy of 52North Health)

POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Neutropenia, a decrease in neutrophils (a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infections), is a frequent side effect of certain cancer treatments. This condition elevates the risk of infections,... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: The OvaCis Rapid Test discriminates benign from malignant epithelial ovarian cysts (Photo courtesy of INEX)

Intra-Operative POC Device Distinguishes Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Cysts within 15 Minutes

Ovarian cysts represent a significant health issue for women globally, with up to 10% experiencing this condition at some point in their lives. These cysts form when fluid collects within a thin membrane... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.