We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
PURITAN MEDICAL

Download Mobile App




Immunoglobulin E Tests Not Always Reliable for Infants

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 02 Jan 2012
Print article
Physicians are warned not to rely on allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests for pediatric allergies.

The mere detection of sensitization to an allergen on IgE tests is not always equivalent to a clinical diagnosis, cautioned a clinical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

The advisory from two allergists, Robert Wood of the Johns Hopkins Children's Center (Baltimore, MD, USA) and Scott Sicherer of Mt. Sinai Hospital (New York, NY, USA), urges clinicians to use caution when ordering allergy tests and to avoid making a diagnosis based solely on test results.

Most allergies result in the production of IgE antibodies that are specific to that allergen. A report, published in the January 2012 issue of Pediatrics, offers aid to pediatricians in selecting the appropriate allergy tests, and interpreting the results in the context of a patient history and clinical presentation.

The detailed medical history and tests must be interpreted in the presence of a clinical presentation, the authors noted. For instance, a child who eats eggs without any symptoms does not need to undergo testing for an egg allergy. The same holds true for pollen testing when a child is not physically exposed to a certain pollen.

In vitro allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing is widely available to physicians, but the report sets out several caveats that physicians need to keep in mind when using these tests and before embarking on immunotherapy.

Both serum sIgE tests and skin-prick tests have similar diagnostic properties with specific pros and cons. Skin-prick tests offer immediate results and are low cost, but they require the availability of rash-free skin.

Serologic tests are not affected by antihistamines or extensive dermatitis, but require a blood sample and cost more.

The report also includes guidance on specific allergies: e.g., for asthma the physician is advised to follow national guidelines and test for indoor allergens (dust mites, mold). There is no current evidence that testing for total IgE will identify specific food allergies. In addition IgE tests are not relevant for many drug reactions. The diagnostic value of serum tests is not well characterized for latex allergies. A localized reaction at an insect bite or sting site does not indicate a risk for anaphylaxis; testing is not warranted.

In vitro allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) testing is widely available to physicians, but the report sets out several caveats that physicians need to keep in mind when using these tests and before embarking on immunotherapy.

Related Links:

Johns Hopkins Children's Center
Mt. Sinai Hospital


Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Test
GPP-100 Anti-CCP Kit
Gold Member
Fully Automated Cell Density/Viability Analyzer
BioProfile FAST CDV

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: A blood test could predict lung cancer risk more accurately and reduce the number of required scans (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Blood Test Accurately Predicts Lung Cancer Risk and Reduces Need for Scans

Lung cancer is extremely hard to detect early due to the limitations of current screening technologies, which are costly, sometimes inaccurate, and less commonly endorsed by healthcare professionals compared... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Comparison of traditional histopathology imaging vs. PARS raw data (Photo courtesy of University of Waterloo)

AI-Powered Digital Imaging System to Revolutionize Cancer Diagnosis

The process of biopsy is important for confirming the presence of cancer. In the conventional histopathology technique, tissue is excised, sliced, stained, mounted on slides, and examined under a microscope... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.