We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
RANDOX LABORATORIES

Download Mobile App





Study Finds Significant Variability in Accuracy of Marketed COVID-19 Antibody Tests

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 20 Jul 2020
Print article
Illustration
Illustration
A new study by a group of international researchers has found significant variability in the accuracy of currently available COVID-19 antibody tests.

Serological diagnostic tests are being increasingly used to provide a broader understanding of COVID-19 incidence and to assess immunity status in the population. The urgent need for the development of serological diagnostic tests in response to the COVID-19 outbreak has compelled regulatory bodies to implement emergency use authorization programs to expedite the commercialization process of these tests. In light of this, independent and robust post-market evaluations of COVID-19 serological tests are needed to confirm manufacturers’ performance claims.

However, there are discrepancies between claimed and actual performance data for serological diagnostic tests on the market. In the study 'COVID-19 Serological Tests: How Well Do They Actually Perform?', the researchers conducted a review of independent studies evaluating the performance of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. The researchers included studies that reported sensitivity and specificity, stage of disease (early, intermediate, or late), the test format (CLIA, ELISA, RDT), and antibody target (IgA, IgG, IgM, or IgG + IgM). If available, the SARS-CoV-2 antigens used for antibody detection were recorded. The studies that did not specify the disease stage of test samples were grouped under the “overall” category and assessed separately. In total, the researchers reviewed performance data on five serological CLIA tests, 15 serological ELISA tests, and 42 serological RDTs currently on the market.

They found significant variability in the accuracy of marketed tests and highlight several lab-based and point-of-care rapid serological tests with high levels of performance. The findings of this review highlight the need for ongoing independent evaluations of commercialized COVID-19 diagnostic tests.

"No single assay can be used for all diagnostic use cases in the COVID-19 response for a country. What works well in one setting may be inappropriate or not accessible for another. As such, access to information on test performance, that is generated independently, greatly assists countries in informed decision-making," said study co-author Robyn Meurant, Executive Director of Health Sciences for NSF International.

"Antibody testing is important to understand the extent of exposure for COVID-19 so it can be effectively monitored and treated. It is important for regional and national governments to continue their coordinated efforts to independently validate antibody test performance and also partner with industry to scale up manufacturing and production capacity," said Ali Ardakani, Founder & Managing Director at Novateur Ventures.





Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Test
GPP-100 Anti-CCP Kit
Gold Member
SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay
Reliance SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay Kit

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: A blood test could predict lung cancer risk more accurately and reduce the number of required scans (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Blood Test Accurately Predicts Lung Cancer Risk and Reduces Need for Scans

Lung cancer is extremely hard to detect early due to the limitations of current screening technologies, which are costly, sometimes inaccurate, and less commonly endorsed by healthcare professionals compared... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Exosomes can be a promising biomarker for cellular rejection after organ transplant (Photo courtesy of Nicolas Primola/Shutterstock)

Diagnostic Blood Test for Cellular Rejection after Organ Transplant Could Replace Surgical Biopsies

Transplanted organs constantly face the risk of being rejected by the recipient's immune system which differentiates self from non-self using T cells and B cells. T cells are commonly associated with acute... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Comparison of traditional histopathology imaging vs. PARS raw data (Photo courtesy of University of Waterloo)

AI-Powered Digital Imaging System to Revolutionize Cancer Diagnosis

The process of biopsy is important for confirming the presence of cancer. In the conventional histopathology technique, tissue is excised, sliced, stained, mounted on slides, and examined under a microscope... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.