We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES AG

Download Mobile App




Events

09 Apr 2024 - 12 Apr 2024
15 Apr 2024 - 17 Apr 2024
23 Apr 2024 - 26 Apr 2024

Sequencing Finds Germline Risk Variants in Pediatric Cancer Cases

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 25 Apr 2019
Print article
Image: A model for the impact of TP53 variant allele frequency on disease progression in myeloid neoplasms (Photo courtesy of Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute).
Image: A model for the impact of TP53 variant allele frequency on disease progression in myeloid neoplasms (Photo courtesy of Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute).
Somatic panel sequencing is increasingly used in pediatric oncology to aid in cancer diagnosis, risk classification, identification of targetable biomarkers, and treatment planning. As tumor tissues contain both somatic and germline variants, tumor profiling can uncover potential germline changes incidentally.

An analysis of thousands of variants detected in a large pediatric cancer cohort through tumor sequencing can identify potential pathogenic germline variants that may have predisposed the individuals to cancer and to evaluate factors that affect germline variant prediction has been reported.

A team of scientists at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Philadelphia, PA, USA) analyzed data from 1,425 tumors in 1,239 individuals for potential cancer-predisposing germline variants over the period of January 2016 to October 2018. The team used the somatic sequencing panels CHOP OncoMark Heme and OncoMark Solid. Variants were considered potentially germline if they met one of the following criteria: 1) pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in genes known to be associated with cancer predisposition with variant allele frequency (VAF) between 0.4-1.0; 2) large indels or gross deletions/duplications affecting capture of potential germline variants, regardless of VAF; 3) known founder mutations, regardless of VAF; and/or 4) pathogenic variants in a gene that could be causal for the patient’s tumor type, regardless of VAF.

The scientists reported that a total of 245 variants identified in 179 individuals were concerning presence in the germline, which accounted for a total of 14% of the patients evaluated with somatic testing. The gene in which variants concerning for germline origin was most commonly identified was TP53, followed by NF1, SMARCB1, MUTYH, and APC. Of the 60 variants that underwent confirmatory germline sequencing at the time of the report, 30 (50%) of them were confirmed to be germline. Of variants confirmed to be germline, 73.3% were referred due to patient’s tumor type regardless of VAF, three-fold higher than those due to VAF alone (23.3%). However, 76.7% of the confirmed germline variants have VAF >0.4, compared to 53.3% of non-germline variants. There is no significant difference regarding the rates of loss of heterozygosity between the two groups (53.3% versus 40.0%).

The authors concluded that the frequency of potential germline variants incidentally uncovered during somatic tumor sequencing was higher than expected based on other large sequencing studies. Half of the variants undergoing confirmatory testing were confirmed in the germline. Identification of these variants is crucial for the appropriate clinical management of these patients as well as at-risk family members.

Suzanne P. MacFarland, MD, an Oncologist and lead author of the study, said, “Patient tumor type appeared to be the best predictor of an underlying germline variant, and variant allele frequency and loss of heterozygosity were less sensitive but still helpful in identifying patients with potential cancer predisposition.” The study was presented at the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics annual meeting held April 2-6, 2019, in Seattle, WA, USA.

Related Links:
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
HLX
POCT Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer
FIA Go
New
Gold Member
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The low-cost portable device rapidly identifies chemotherapy patients at risk of sepsis (Photo courtesy of 52North Health)

POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Neutropenia, a decrease in neutrophils (a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infections), is a frequent side effect of certain cancer treatments. This condition elevates the risk of infections,... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: The OvaCis Rapid Test discriminates benign from malignant epithelial ovarian cysts (Photo courtesy of INEX)

Intra-Operative POC Device Distinguishes Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Cysts within 15 Minutes

Ovarian cysts represent a significant health issue for women globally, with up to 10% experiencing this condition at some point in their lives. These cysts form when fluid collects within a thin membrane... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.