We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES

Download Mobile App




Unnecessary Testing for UTIs Significantly Reduced

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 04 Mar 2019
Print article
Image: Unnecessary testing for urinary tract infections can be significantly reduced (Photo courtesy of Nicole Wetsman).
Image: Unnecessary testing for urinary tract infections can be significantly reduced (Photo courtesy of Nicole Wetsman).
Tests to detect urinary tract infections (UTI) often are performed routinely in hospitals, even when patients do not have symptoms. Such testing "just to be safe" can return results that lead doctors to prescribe antibiotics when there is little to no evidence to warrant such treatment.

A new study indicates that making a simple change to the electronic system used by doctors to order urine tests can cut by nearly half the number of bacterial culture tests ordered without compromising the ability to identify people who need treatment for UTIs. The change encouraged doctors to first look for signs of a UTI before testing a patient's urine for bacteria.

Medical scientists at the Washington University School of Medicine (St Louis, MO, USA) and their colleagues evaluated the impact of changes to urine testing ordered in computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system on urine culturing practices. The team made two changes to encourage more informative urine testing among their colleagues at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St. Louis, MO, USA).

First, they sent an email to all clinicians explaining the rationale behind ordering a urine dipstick test for signs of infection before ordering a bacterial culture test. Then, they changed the electronic ordering system. They set the default to a urine dipstick test followed by a bacterial culture test, rather than a culture test alone, which had previously been the first option. Clinicians who wished to order a culture test alone could still do so, but they had to open an additional screen on their computers.

The investigators compared all urine culture tests ordered at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in the 15 months before the intervention, staged in April 2016, to the 15 months after. Before the intervention, doctors ordered 15,746 urine cultures, or 38 orders per 1,000 patient-days. After the intervention, they ordered 45% fewer: a total of 8,823, or 21 orders per 1,000 patient-days. In particular, the number of urine cultures from people with catheters, who are at high risk of UTIs, dropped from 7.8 to 1.9 per 1000 patient-days while the number of catheter-associated UTIs did not change at all. There were 125 diagnosed catheter-associated UTIs in each time period.

Since it costs about USD 15 to perform a urine culture, the intervention saved approximately USD 104,000 in laboratory costs alone over the 15-month period. The team was unable to obtain pharmacy records to determine whether more careful testing decreased antibiotic prescriptions, but previous studies have shown that minimizing unwarranted testing does reduce antibiotic overuse.

David K. Warren, MD, a professor of medicine and the senior author of the study, said, “Over-testing for UTIs drives up health-care costs and leads to unnecessary antibiotic use which spreads antibiotic resistance. Ordering tests when the patient needs them is a good thing. But ordering tests when it's not indicated wastes resources and can subject patients to unnecessary treatment. We were able to reduce the number of tests ordered substantially without diminishing the quality of care at all, and at a substantial cost savings.” The study was published on February 21, 2019, in the journal Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.

Related Links:
Washington University School of Medicine
Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
Complement 3 (C3) Test
GPP-100 C3 Kit
Gold Member
Systemic Autoimmune Testing Assay
BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen with MDSS

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: A false color scanning election micrograph of lung cancer cells grown in culture (Photo courtesy of Anne Weston)

AI Tool Precisely Matches Cancer Drugs to Patients Using Information from Each Tumor Cell

Current strategies for matching cancer patients with specific treatments often depend on bulk sequencing of tumor DNA and RNA, which provides an average profile from all cells within a tumor sample.... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Fingertip blood sample collection on the Babson Handwarmer (Photo courtesy of Babson Diagnostics)

Unique Hand-Warming Technology Supports High-Quality Fingertip Blood Sample Collection

Warming the hand is an effective way to facilitate blood collection from a fingertip, yet off-the-shelf solutions often do not fulfill laboratory requirements. Now, a unique hand-warming technology has... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.