We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Vicotex

EPPENDORF AG

Eppendorf is a life science company that develops and sells instruments, consumables, and services for liquid-, sampl... read more Featured Products: More products

Download Mobile App




Molecular Testing Accuracy for Clostridium difficile Scrutinized

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 31 Aug 2016
Accurate diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is paramount for patient management and the wrong diagnosis places patients at risk, delays treatment, and/ or contributes to transmission of infection in the healthcare setting.

The selection of diagnostic tests to confirm CDI is controversial because of the variety of laboratory methods that are available and used across various facilities, and lack of standard recommendations for testing. More...
Although amplification of the toxin B gene by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive method for detecting toxigenic C. difficile, false negative results still occur and could impact the diagnosis and treatment of this infection.

Scientists at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine (Sudbury, ON, Canada) and their colleagues tested stool samples from patients with diarrhea, and suspected of having CDI, were tested in the diagnostic laboratory for C. difficile using a PCR test and culture techniques. Multiplex PCR was performed on presumptive C. difficile isolates to detect the Toxin A gene (tcdA), Toxin B gene (tcdB), and the triose phosphate isomerase gene (tpi). The reactions were carried out in an Eppendorf Mastercycler nexus thermal cycler (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, ON, Canada).

A total of 2,308 samples were tested for toxigenic C. difficile by GeneXpert C. difficile epi test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and culture methods over a 15-month period. The observed agreement of the results of the two tests was 95.1%. A total of 295 samples tested positive by GeneXpert, while 2,013 samples were negative by GeneXpert. C. difficile isolated from the discrepant samples resulted in diverse ribotyping patterns suggesting they were derived from different strains. The samples belonged to patients who were distributed evenly between age groups and wards in the hospital. In the majority of cases, the false negative C. difficile test results did not seem to impact the clinical outcome in these patients.

The authors concluded that although molecular methods are considered among the most sensitive methods available for clinical diagnosis of CDI, it seems inevitable that some cases, which are positive for C. difficile, might be missed when using this method, or any other method for that matter. Both clinical and analytical sensitivity of C. difficile tests should be considered when deciding which diagnostic assay to use, and clinical correlates should be examined carefully before excluding CDI as a cause of disease. The study was published on August 19, 2016, in the journal BMC Infectious Diseases.

Related Links:
Northern Ontario School of Medicine
Fisher Scientific
Cepheid

Gold Member
H-FABP Assay
Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Assay
Online QC Software
Acusera 24•7
Automatic CLIA Analyzer
Shine i6000
Hematology Consumables
Bioblood Devices
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Illustration of the new blood test, which uses a DNA chip to detect the tumor’s biological fingerprint (Photo courtesy of Tel Aviv University)

Blood Test on a Chip Offers Low-Cost Lung Cancer Detection Without DNA Sequencing

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and screening often yields indeterminate results that prompt invasive workups. Computed tomography (CT) detects small nodules but can flag benign... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image Credit: Adobe Stock

Whole-Cell Genomic Analysis Expands the Potential of Liquid Biopsy

Liquid biopsy has expanded access to tumor genomics, but most blood-based assays rely on short, degraded fragments of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Isolating intact circulating tumor cells from... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Through the PCCP, Proscia gains a more efficient pathway to expand Concentriq AP-Dx interoperability while maintaining regulatory oversight (Photo courtesy of Proscia)

FDA-Cleared Digital Pathology Platform Expands Interoperability for Primary Diagnosis

Rising cancer incidence is colliding with a shrinking pathologist workforce, intensifying pressure on diagnostic turnaround times in clinical laboratories. Many labs are adopting digital pathology to manage... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.