We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
LGC Clinical Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Test Results of Fingerstick Blood Vary Significantly

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 29 Nov 2015
Blood obtained via fingerstick is commonly used in point-of-care assays, but few studies have assessed variability in parameters obtained from successive drops of fingerstick blood, which may cause problems for clinical decision making and for assessing accuracy of point-of-care tests.

The most accurate way to carry out medial laboratory tests is to draw blood from a vein and send it to a laboratory but sometimes, such as in low-resource settings, results are needed more rapidly, or the health professional is not trained to draw vein-blood, or there is no laboratory. More...
In such settings, there is a higher reliance on fingerstick tests.

Bioengineers at Rice University (Houston, TX, USA) used a hematology analyzer to analyze the hemoglobin concentration, total white blood cell (WBC) count, three-part WBC differential, and platelet count in six successive 20 µL of blood collected from one fingerstick from each of 11 donors. The team used a hemoglobinometer to measure the hemoglobin concentration of 10 drops of fingerstick blood from each of seven donors to check whether the minimum droplet size made a difference and they checked all the results against blood taken from donors' veins. They also followed best practice to ensure accurate results. For example, they wiped away the first droplet to remove traces of disinfectant, and they did not squeeze or "milk" the finger.

The results showed that hemoglobin content, platelet count and white blood cell count varied significantly from drop to drop. The average percent coefficient of variation (CV) for successive drops of fingerstick blood was higher by up to 3.4 times for hemoglobin, 5.7 times for WBC count, three times for lymphocyte count, 7.7 times for granulocyte count, and four times for platelets than in venous controls measured using a hematology analyzer. The average percent CV for fingerstick blood was up to five times higher for hemoglobin than venous blood measured using a point-of-care hemoglobinometer. The investigators found that averaging the results of six to nine successive droplet tests produced results on a par with the venous blood tests.

Meaghan M. Bond, a doctoral student and first author of the study, said, “In some donors, the hemoglobin concentration changed by more than 2 g/dL in the span of two successive drops of blood. Our results show that people need to take care to administer fingerstick tests in a way that produces accurate results because accuracy in these tests is increasingly important for diagnosing conditions like anemia, infections and sickle-cell anemia, malaria, HIV and other diseases.” The study was published on November 18, 2015, in the American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Related Links:

Rice University



Gold Member
Serological Pipet Controller
PIPETBOY GENIUS
Verification Panels for Assay Development & QC
Seroconversion Panels
New
Alpha-Fetoprotein Reagent
AFP Reagent Kit
New
Herpes Simplex Virus ELISA
HSV 2 IgG – ELISA
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The GlycoLocate platform uses multi-omics and advanced computational biology algorithms to diagnose early-stage cancers (Photo courtesy of AOA Dx)

AI-Powered Blood Test Accurately Detects Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer ranks as the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women, largely due to late-stage diagnoses. Although over 90% of women exhibit symptoms in Stage I, only 20% are diagnosed in... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: The cancer stem cell test can accurately choose more effective treatments (Photo courtesy of University of Cincinnati)

Stem Cell Test Predicts Treatment Outcome for Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer frequently responds to chemotherapy initially, but eventually, the tumor develops resistance to the therapy, leading to regrowth. This resistance is partially due to the activation... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Schematic diagram of multimodal single-cell MSI using tapping-mode scanning probe electrospray ionization (Photo courtesy of Yoichi Otsuka)

New Technology Improves Understanding of Complex Biological Samples

Tissues are composed of a complex mixture of various cell types, which complicates our understanding of their biological roles and the study of diseases. Now, a multi-institutional team of researchers... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: The new algorithms can help predict which patients have undiagnosed cancer (Photo courtesy of Adobe Stock)

Advanced Predictive Algorithms Identify Patients Having Undiagnosed Cancer

Two newly developed advanced predictive algorithms leverage a person’s health conditions and basic blood test results to accurately predict the likelihood of having an undiagnosed cancer, including ch... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.