Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

CEPHEID

Develops, manufactures, and markets molecular systems and tests for institutions to perform sophisticated genetic tes... read more Featured Products: More products

Download Mobile App




Whole Blood DNA Extraction Methods Compared

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 14 Aug 2014
In the clinical laboratory, nucleic acids are routinely isolated from various types of specimen, including blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, stool, urine, buccal swabs, and respiratory specimens, for use in a wide array of molecular diagnostic tests.

Both the quality and quantity of the extracted nucleic acids are crucial to the successful implementation of downstream molecular diagnostic procedures, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR, microarray analyses, and direct sequencing.

Laboratory scientists at the Asian Medical Center (Seoul, Republic of Korea) collected blood samples from five healthy donors and all DNA extraction processes were performed within six hours of specimen collection. More...
The team evaluated the efficiency of three extraction methods by comparison based on the total amount of extracted DNA adjusted by input blood volume, and the purity of the extract. Polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed using the Actin Beta gene (ACTB) as a target. The real-time PCR assay was carried out for housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Total elapsed time for DNA extraction was compared.

The three extraction methods were the Nextractor NX-48 system, (Genolution; Seoul, Republic of Korea); the manual QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen; Valencia, CA, USA), and the automated Maxwell system method (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). Following DNA extraction, the optical density of each sample was read at 260 nm and 280 nm using a NanoDrop ND-2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific; Wilmington, DE, USA). Real-time PCR was run on a SmartCycler system (Cepheid; Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Extraction efficiencies for the QIAamp was 25.4 ± 3.8 ng/μL, for the Maxwell it was 9.2 ± 0.6 ng/μL, and the Nextractor system was the most efficient at 31.0 ± 5.6 ng/μL. No significant differences in purity were observed among three methods. DNA extracted using the ACTB was successfully amplified in all three methods. There were no obvious differences in cycle threshold (Ct) values for GAPDH real-time PCR. Total elapsed time for DNA extraction was about 50 minutes for the QIAamp, 40 minutes for the Maxwell, and 20 minutes for the Nextractor.

The authors concluded that both the purity and yield of the Nextractor system were similar to that of manual extraction. The relative speed and low hands-on time represent clear benefits over manual processes. Therefore, the Nextractor system represents a useful alternative to manual DNA extraction in clinical laboratories that is suitable for many downstream molecular diagnostic applications. The study was published in the August 2014 issue of the journal Clinica Chimica Acta.

Related Links:

Asian Medical Center
Genolution
Cepheid



New
Gold Member
Serological Pipets
INTEGRA Serological Pipets
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
New
6 Part Hematology Analyzer with RET + IPF
Mispa HX 88
New
Blood Glucose Test Strip
AutoSense Test
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Hematology

view channel
Image: Platelets sequester cfDNA during circulation (Murphy L. et al., Science, 2025; DOI: 10.1126/science.adp3971)

Platelets Could Improve Early and Minimally Invasive Detection of Cancer

Platelets are widely recognized for their role in blood clotting and scab formation, but they also play a crucial role in immune defense by detecting pathogens and recruiting immune cells.... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: The test could streamline clinical decision-making by identifying ideal candidates for immunotherapy upfront (Xiao, Y. et al. Cancer Biology & Medicine July 2025, 20250038)

Blood Test Predicts Immunotherapy Efficacy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype lacking targeted therapies, making immunotherapy a promising yet unpredictable option. Current biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression or tumor... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: New diagnostics could predict a woman’s risk of a common sexually transmitted infection (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

New Markers Could Predict Risk of Severe Chlamydia Infection

Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can cause pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and other reproductive complications when it spreads to the upper genital tract.... Read more

Pathology

view channel
image: Researchers Marco Gustav (right) and MD Nic G. Reitsam (left) discuss the study data (Photo courtesy of Anja Stübner/EKFZ)

AI Model Simultaneously Detects Multiple Genetic Colorectal Cancer Markers in Tissue Samples

Colorectal cancer is a complex disease influenced by multiple genetic alterations. Traditionally, studies and diagnostic tools have focused on predicting only one mutation at a time, overlooking the interplay... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.