We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES

Illumina

Illumina develops, manufactures and markets integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variations and biological ... read more Featured Products: More products

Download Mobile App




Broad Gene Panel Diagnoses Patients With Kidney Disease

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 13 Apr 2022
Print article
Image: Renasight is a test to determine if there is a genetic cause for an individual’s kidney disease or if there is an increased hereditary risk due to family history. The test uses a blood or saliva sample to test 385 genes associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Photo courtesy of Natera)
Image: Renasight is a test to determine if there is a genetic cause for an individual’s kidney disease or if there is an increased hereditary risk due to family history. The test uses a blood or saliva sample to test 385 genes associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (Photo courtesy of Natera)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue in the USA. Identification of monogenic causes of CKD, which are present in ∼10% of adult cases, can impact prognosis and patient management. For the ∼800,000 individuals in the USA with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), genetic diagnosis may inform the selection of potential-related kidney donors, assess the risk of disease recurrence, and guide clinical management following transplant.

Broad gene panels offer several advantages over mutational analysis of individual genes or targeted panels. The phenotypic variability of rare and multisystem disorders, including the unpredictable interaction of causative variants, complicates the selection of appropriate targets. Broad gene panels provide an economical, comprehensive analysis that can reduce barriers to testing by streamlining testing procedures, reimbursement, report structure, and genetic counseling capabilities.

A team of Nephrologists led by those at Wake Forest School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, NC, USA) carried out a retrospective analysis of 1,007 consecutive tests performed on patients with a 382 renal gene NGS panel (the Renasight test, Natera, San Carlos, CA, USA). The median age was 46 years (range 5–91), of which, 52.7% (531/1,007) were female. Information about a patient’s kidney disease status was available for 96.5% (973/1,007) of cases, of which 95.0% (924/973) were affected.

Genomic DNA isolated from the accessioned samples (blood or buccal saliva) was prepared into libraries using a customized hybrid capture enrichment protocol targeting key coding exons and splicing junctions based on IDT xGen Lockdown probe chemistry (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., Coralville, IA, USA). Paired-end sequencing was then performed on DNA libraries on the Illumina platform 2,500 HiSeq or NovaSeq 6,000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), using 300bp reads.

The scientists reported pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants. Positive findings included a monoallelic P/LP variant in an autosomal dominant or X-linked gene and biallelic P/LP variants in autosomal recessive genes. Positive genetic findings were identified in 21.1% (212/1,007) of cases. A total of 220 positive results were identified across 48 genes. Positive results occurred most frequently in the PKD1 (34.1%), COL4A5 (10.9%), PKD2 (10.0%), COL4A4 (6.4%), COL4A3 (5.9%), and TTR (4.1%) genes. Variants identified in the remaining 42 genes comprised 28.6% of the total positive findings, including single positive results in 26 genes. Positive results in >1 gene were identified in 7.5% (16/212) of cases.

The authors concluded that genetic results from individuals tested with the Renasight test, a broad gene panel for evaluation for CKD, nephrolithiasis, and electrolyte abnormalities, revealed a high rate of positive findings representing a variety of both common, and rare genetic diagnoses. The study revealed cases in which positive findings were identified in more than one gene. The study was published on March 24, 2022 in the American Journal of Nephrology.

Related Links:
Wake Forest School of Medicine 
Natera 
Integrated DNA Technologies 
Illumina 

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Test
GPP-100 Anti-CCP Kit
New
Gold Member
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Exosomes can be a promising biomarker for cellular rejection after organ transplant (Photo courtesy of Nicolas Primola/Shutterstock)

Diagnostic Blood Test for Cellular Rejection after Organ Transplant Could Replace Surgical Biopsies

Transplanted organs constantly face the risk of being rejected by the recipient's immune system which differentiates self from non-self using T cells and B cells. T cells are commonly associated with acute... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Comparison of traditional histopathology imaging vs. PARS raw data (Photo courtesy of University of Waterloo)

AI-Powered Digital Imaging System to Revolutionize Cancer Diagnosis

The process of biopsy is important for confirming the presence of cancer. In the conventional histopathology technique, tissue is excised, sliced, stained, mounted on slides, and examined under a microscope... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.