We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Flow Cytometry Utilized to Screen Urine Specimens

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 02 Feb 2011
A flow cytometer can be used to screen urine samples rapidly to determine the presence white blood cells and bacteria. More...


Screening urine by flow cytometry would minimize the number of specimens cultured yet ensuring that all true positives were cultured.The method was used in a study at the University of Manitoba, (Winnipeg, MB, Canada) where 2,496 urine specimens were screened and cultured. Urine specimens were cultured on nonselective differentiation medium and analyzed by the UF-1000i urine fluorescence-flow cytometer. Various combinations of WBC/bacterial counts were assessed as screening criteria and correlated with significant growth on the culture medium.

The urine samples were cultured on CHROMaga Orientation medium (Becton Dickinson, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Of the 2,496 samples of urine cultured, 75% were midstream urine and 25% were catheterized urine. Of the midstream urine specimens, 27.3% grew significant pathogens (SIGs), 68.6% showed nonsignificant growth (NSIG), whereas 4.1% had growth suggestive of possible contamination (PCON). Of the 622 catheter urine samples cultured, 34.2% grew SIGs, 61.2% showed NSIG, whereas 4.6% showed PCON.

The flow cytometer, UF-1000i, is a product of Sysmex (Mississauga, ON, Canada) and it was provided for this study by bioMérieux, (St Laurent, QC, Canada).

A bacterial count equal to or greater than 20 from the flow cytometer (UF) gave an overall screening sensitivity of 92.6%, allowing 35% of specimens to be screened out and not cultured. The sensitivity was 99.2% and 85.0% for Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms, respectively, using the same bacterial count. There were 27 patients with UF false-negative results, but only four had urinary tract infections and were treated using appropriate antibiotics. The authors concluded that the study indicated that UF was a simple, rapid, and reliable method for urine screening when the bacterial count of above 19 was used as the sole screening criterion. The study was published in the February 2010 issue of Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease.

Related Links:

University of Manitoba
BectonDickinson
Sysmex
bioMérieux



Gold Member
Quality Control Material
iPLEX Pro Exome QC Panel
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
Capillary Blood Collection Tube
IMPROMINI M3
ESR Analyzer
TEST1 2.0
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Hematology

view channel
Image: Residual leukemia cells may predict long-term survival in acute myeloid leukemia (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

MRD Tests Could Predict Survival in Leukemia Patients

Acute myeloid leukemia is an aggressive blood cancer that disrupts normal blood cell production and often relapses even after intensive treatment. Clinicians currently lack early, reliable markers to predict... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.