We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
PURITAN MEDICAL

Hologic

Designs and provides products for clinical laboratory and blood screening, including testing items for detection of h... read more Featured Products: More products

Download Mobile App




Commercial RT-PCR Tests Compared to Culture for Bacterial Gastroenteritis

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 11 Jan 2022
Print article
Image: ProGastro SSCS is a multiplex real time PCR for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, (C. jejuni and C. coli only, undifferentiated) nucleic acids and Shiga Toxin 1 (stx1) and Shiga Toxin 2 (stx2) genes (Photo courtesy of Hologic)
Image: ProGastro SSCS is a multiplex real time PCR for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, (C. jejuni and C. coli only, undifferentiated) nucleic acids and Shiga Toxin 1 (stx1) and Shiga Toxin 2 (stx2) genes (Photo courtesy of Hologic)
Nucleic acid-based testing (culture-independent diagnostic testing, CIDT) for bacterial gastroenteritis offers three major advantages over culture-based diagnosis: it has better analytical sensitivity, is less labor intensive through automation, and has faster turnaround times.

Multiple commercial nucleic acid test assays (i.e. real-time PCR, RT-PCR) are available, testing at a minimum of four pathogens (Salmonella, Campylobacter, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Shigella). However, there are many caveats associated with CIDT for bacterial gastroenteritis, and gaps in the evaluation of commercial assays.

Clinical Microbiologists at the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB, Canada) and their colleagues used clinical stool specimens and contrived samples comprising commonly circulating species, serotypes, biovars, and/or toxin subtypes were for a comparison of four commercial RT-PCR tests. The four tests were: RIDAGENE Bacterial Stool Panel and EHEC/EPEC Panel (R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany); FTD Bacterial Gastroenteritis assay (Fast Track Diagnostics, Luxembourg); BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel and Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel (BD Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada); Prodesse ProGastr SSCS Assay (Hologic Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

The four commercial RT-PCR assays were challenged with 67 contrived stool specimens, each spiked with an isolate representing different Campylobacter species, Salmonella serotypes, Shigella species and serotypes, STEC toxin subtypes, Y. enterocolitica serotypes/biotypes, and Yersina spp; these isolates are the common circulating types in Alberta, Canada. All assays gave positive results for C. jejuni, C. coli, Y. enterocolitica, and all species and serotypes of Shigella, but negative results for Y. non-enterocoltica spp. and C. upsaliensis. Most Shiga toxin subtypes were detected by all assays except for stx2f, which was detected by Ridagene.

The performance of the four commercial assays was assessed using 171 clinical fecal specimens collected prospectively, which were initially tested by culture at the frontline diagnostic laboratories. This included feces that were 125 culture-positive or 46 culture-negative for Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella, STEC, or Y. enterocolitica. Using culture as a reference standard, the sensitivity for all organisms (excluding Yersinia) was >96% for all four assays and specificity was >90%, except for BD Max (87%).

The authors concluded that their study provided a third-party evaluation of four commercially available RT-PCR assays for bacterial gastroenteritis and demonstrated the assays to be mostly equivalent to each other and culture with a few caveats. Depending on the prevalence of certain stx sub-types, Yersinia species, and Campylobacter species in a laboratory's jurisdiction, without further improvement in culture-independent tests, culture methods remain critical for the detection of these pathogens. The study was published on January 1, 2022 in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Related Links:
University of Calgary
R-Biopharm
Fast Track Diagnostics
BD Canada
Hologic


Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
POCT Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer
FIA Go
Gold Member
Systemic Autoimmune Testing Assay
BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen with MDSS

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: A false color scanning election micrograph of lung cancer cells grown in culture (Photo courtesy of Anne Weston)

AI Tool Precisely Matches Cancer Drugs to Patients Using Information from Each Tumor Cell

Current strategies for matching cancer patients with specific treatments often depend on bulk sequencing of tumor DNA and RNA, which provides an average profile from all cells within a tumor sample.... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Fingertip blood sample collection on the Babson Handwarmer (Photo courtesy of Babson Diagnostics)

Unique Hand-Warming Technology Supports High-Quality Fingertip Blood Sample Collection

Warming the hand is an effective way to facilitate blood collection from a fingertip, yet off-the-shelf solutions often do not fulfill laboratory requirements. Now, a unique hand-warming technology has... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.