Prothrombin Time Derived from POC Test Compared to Laboratory Test

Scientists at Yonsei University College of Medicine (Seoul, Korea) collected 91 venous blood samples submitted for fibrinogen testing to the clinical laboratory. Platelet-poor plasma was obtained by centrifugation. The fibrinogen level was measured using Fibrinogen-C XL reagent (Instrumentation Laboratory; Milan, Italy) via Clauss method using ACL TOP (Beckman Coulter; Fullerton, CA, USA). Samples were selected after fibrinogen testing according to the fibrinogen level. PT INR was measured by both the laboratory method and CoaguChek XS (Roche Diagnostics; Mannheim, Germany).

The samples were stratified into low, mid, and high fibrinogen groups by fibrinogen levels of <130 mg/dL, 130–450 mg/dL, and >450 mg/dL, respectively. The mean INR difference of the low fibrinogen group was significantly different from that of the mid or high fibrinogen group. In the low fibrinogen group, CoaguChek XS INR showed a negative bias compared with the laboratory INR, while the mid and high fibrinogen groups had positive bias.

The authors concluded that that patient selection according to fibrinogen status should precede the implementation of POC testing using CoaguChek XS. Also, periodic comparisons between CoaguChek XS and laboratory INR results should be continued during the use of CoaguChek XS. The study was published on January 31, 2015, in the Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.

Related Links:
Yonsei University College of Medicine
Instrumentation Laboratory
Roche Diagnostics