We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Hand-Held Device Detects Antigens on Bacterial Surfaces

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 24 Nov 2009
A quality control test detects bacterial contamination in whole blood-derived, pooled platelets prior to transfusion.

The platelet pan genera detection (PGD) test targets common antigens found on the surface of all species of bacteria known to be pathogenic to humans. More...
It consists of an easy-to-use disposable handheld device, similar in size and appearance to a pregnancy test, and reagents that work together to detect the presence of bacterial contaminants in platelets.

Bacterial contamination in platelets is a serious threat to transfusion safety. More than 5 million platelet doses are transfused annually worldwide. Studies show that up to 1 in 2,000 doses may contain bacteria, which can cause a range of reactions, including death, especially in immune-compromised patients.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA; Silver Spring, MD, USA) cleared the Verax Platelet PGD test as a quality control test to detect bacterial contamination in whole blood-derived, pooled and single donor platelets prior to transfusion. Fenwal (Lake Zurich, IL, USA) is the exclusive global distributor of the test, which was developed by Verax Biomedical (Worcester, MA, USA). The test can be performed in approximately 30 minutes and is designed for use in hospitals, cancer centers, and other sites of care as a safeguard before transfusion.

Platelets are collected from whole-blood donations or via apheresis. With whole-blood donations, platelets from four to six whole-blood donors are pooled to produce a single, transfusion dose. In an apheresis platelet donation, a single donor can give one or more transfusion doses of platelets via a machine such as the Fenwal Amicus separator.

The international blood transfusion association AABB issued an Association Bulletin in July 2009 stating, "After publication of data sufficiently robust to support application of an assay appropriate for use near the time of platelet issue, the current standard will be reappraised. At that time, AABB intended to promulgate an interim standard to require enhanced methods of bacterial detection in whole blood derived (WBD) platelets--either by specifically prohibiting the use of less sensitive methods such as pH or glucose, or by establishing a minimum sensitivity level for methods used to detect bacteria." The Verax Platelet PGD test is an example of such an assay.

"Until now, there was no rapid test cleared by the FDA for detecting bacteria in whole-blood derived platelets," said Louis M. Katz, M.D., chair of AABB's Task Force on Bacterial Contamination. "With such a test now available, we will reexamine the current Standards regarding methods to limit and to detect bacteria in all platelet components.''

Recent studies, including post-market surveillance from Verax, show that up to 70% of units containing bacteria may escape detection by culture testing, which occurs following collection when bacteria may still be at levels too low for detection by culture sampling. The Verax Platelet PGD test is used within a few hours before transfusion, when bacteria, if present, have had a chance to grow to higher, more threatening levels.

"We are pleased that Verax has received clearance for use of the Platelet PGD test on whole blood platelets," said Darrell Triulzi, M.D., medical director of the Institute for Transfusion Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Division of Transfusion Medicine (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). "We are a large user of pooled platelets and have sought a more sensitive method for bacterial screening. The Verax test from Fenwal fills this role with a point-of-issue test that we are confident will reduce the risk of bacterial-contamination reactions. Our preliminary experience indicates that it works well in the transfusion service work flow and that the technologists who administer the test find it easy to use."

Related Links:
AABB
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Fenwal
Verax Biomedical
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center


New
Gold Member
Automatic CLIA Analyzer
Shine i9000
Portable Electronic Pipette
Mini 96
Rapid Molecular Testing Device
FlashDetect Flash10
Laboratory Software
ArtelWare
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: Urine samples can indicate lupus nephritis without the need for repeat and painful renal biopsies (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

Urine Test Could Replace Painful Kidney Biopsies for Lupus Patients

Lupus is an autoimmune disorder that causes the immune system to attack the body’s own tissues and organs. Among the five million people living with lupus globally, nearly half develop lupus nephritis,... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: When assessing the same lung biopsy sample, research shows that only 18% of pathologists will agree on a TCMR diagnosis (Photo courtesy of Thermo Fisher)

Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System Assesses Lung Transplant Rejection

Lung transplant recipients face a significant risk of rejection and often require routine biopsies to monitor graft health, yet assessing the same biopsy sample can be highly inconsistent among pathologists.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.