We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Vicotex

Download Mobile App




Better Blood Glucose Monitor Evaluated for Burn Care

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 18 Sep 2013
Glucose monitoring systems (GMS) with an autocorrect feature can detect red blood cells hematocrit, vitamin C, and other common interferents in burn patients' blood.

Traditional hospital laboratory testing uses plasma samples devoid of red blood cells, so it remains the most accurate method for measuring blood glucose levels. More...
However, the newer autocorrecting devices use less blood, and produce results in just five seconds, as opposed to approximately 10 to 20 minutes for laboratory testing.

A multidisciplinary team at the University of California (Davis, CA, USA) conducted a prospective, observational study followed by a pilot randomized controlled trial. Sixty remnant arterial blood samples were collected to evaluate hematocrit and ascorbic acid effects on accuracy paired against a plasma glucose reference. Another 12 patients were enrolled for a control trial.

The team compared an autocorrecting modified glucose oxidase-based GMS (GMS1; StatStrip Glucose; Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA, USA) versus a noncorrecting glucose dehydrogenase-based GMS (GMS2; AccuChek Advantage; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). GMS1 incorporates a novel four-well gold biosensor that autocorrects for hematocrit, oxidizing substances, and oxygen tension effects. GMS2 is the current device used for routine care at the institution. The hospital clinical chemistry laboratory analyzer (Synchron LX20, Beckman Coulter; Brea, CA, USA) served as the plasma glucose-reference method. All three systems measure glucose via electrochemical techniques.

An inversely proportional relationship between GMS2 results and hematocrit was observed. In contrast, GMS1 was unaffected by hematocrit. Automatic GMS hematocrit correction reduced glycemic variability, insulin rates, and hypoglycemic events. However, patients at risk of hematocrit and vitamin C interferences, especially burn patients receiving high dose vitamin C therapy, will be tested with the hospital's clinical chemistry laboratory analyzer for glucose levels in the future.

Nam K. Tran, PhD, MS, the lead author said, “Many glucose monitoring systems may not adequately correct for interferents in the blood of burn patients. As a result, an inaccurate reading increases the potential for an insulin overdose. Our study showed that using a device that autocorrects for interferents can produce more accurate blood glucose measurements, which can improve insulin dosing and glucose control." The study was published on September 2, 2103, in the Journal of Burn Care Research.

Related Links:

University of California, Davis
Roche Diagnostics
Nova Biomedical



Platinum Member
Automated Coagulation Analyzer
Hemolumi H6
Gold Member
Electrolyte Analyzer
CBS-4000 (CBS-400)
CMV CLIA Diagnostic
CLIA CMV IgA Screen Group
POC Immunoassay Analyzer
Procise DX
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The Avantect Pancreatic Cancer Test combines epigenomic, genomic, and glycan biomarkers with machine learning to detect pancreatic cancer-associated signals in blood (Photo courtesy of ClearNote Health)

Multiomic Blood Test Supports Noninvasive Monitoring and Subtyping in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains difficult to detect early and monitor during treatment, particularly in patients with homologous recombination defects. Clinicians also have limited noninvasive... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Although many people harbor latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), growing evidence has linked the virus to MS pathobiology (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

Blood EBV Activity Biomarkers May Predict Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Months Ahead

Predicting relapse in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains difficult, limiting opportunities for timely intervention and monitoring. Although many people harbor latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), growing evidence... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: Graphical Abstract (Jose A. Céspedes, Maria I. Montañez, Isabel M. Jiménez, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles enable clinically relevant in vitro diagnosis of beta-lactam allergy. Materials Today Bio (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103356)

Magnetic Nanoparticles Enable More Sensitive Beta-Lactam Allergy Testing

Penicillin allergy labels are common in clinical practice, yet many are incorrect and can lead to suboptimal antibiotic choices. Although 8%–25% of people report a penicillin allergy, only 1%–10% are truly... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: A new study demonstrates that vascular features in colorectal tumors could serve as prognostic biomarkers of disease outcome. (Image Credit: iStock)

Tumor Blood Vessel Features May Help Predict Colorectal Cancer Survival

Colorectal cancer outcomes vary widely, and tumor biology remains a key determinant of prognosis. Because neoplasms depend on a vascular supply, differences in intratumoral vessels may influence survival.... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: ADLM recommends that emerging AI tools follow the same professional oversight, quality, validation, and monitoring standards as traditional clinical testing within CLIA’s existing framework (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

ADLM Calls for CLIA Updates to Support Safe AI Use in Laboratory Medicine

Clinical laboratories increasingly use artificial intelligence to verify, interpret, and report results, but safeguards under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) were designed in 1992.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image Credit: Adobe Stock

Mayo Clinic and Thermo Fisher Launch Multi-Omics Venture to Identify Early Disease Signals

Many diseases begin developing years before symptoms emerge, making early detection difficult for healthcare systems and clinical laboratories. Linking molecular changes with longitudinal health data could... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.