We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Transfusion Protocols Compared After Cardiac Surgery

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 25 Mar 2015
Unnecessary blood transfusions may increase healthcare costs both directly, because blood is an increasingly scarce and expensive resource, and indirectly due to the complications associated with transfusion.

Cardiac surgery patients who receive blood transfusions are believed to have more complications such as infections, heart attacks and strokes, and this has led to speculation that avoidance of transfusion will improve clinical outcomes.

A team of scientists led by those at the University of Bristol (UK) and those at Nuffield Department of Population Health (Oxford, UK) recruited patients over 16 years of age undergoing non-emergency cardiac surgery to the clinical trial at 17 UK hospitals. More...
Participants with a hemoglobin (Hb) level of less than 9 g/dL after their operations were randomized to have a transfusion either when they became substantially anemic (transfuse when Hb is “low,” i.e., less than 7.5 g/dL) or straightaway, when they were mildly anemic (transfuse when Hb is “high,” i.e., less than 9 g/dL).

To compare the two transfusion strategies the medical team counted the number of patients who had a serious infection, stroke, heart attack, gut or kidney failure during the first three months after the operation. The trial analyzed information for 2,003 participants, about four times more than the next largest similar trial of low and high thresholds for transfusion in patients having heart surgery.

The scientists found almost all the patients in the “high” group had a blood transfusion (92%) whereas just over half of the patients in the “low” group had a blood transfusion (53%). Slightly more patients had one or more of the serious complications listed above in the “low” group (35%) than the “high” group (33%). Moreover, more patients died in the “low” group (4.2%) than the “high” group (2.6%). This latter finding is clearly very important but it is difficult to interpret because the trial was not primarily designed to compare the difference in the number of deaths. The restrictive threshold was not superior to the liberal threshold with respect to postoperative morbidity or total costs.

Barnaby C Reeves, DPhil, MSc, MFPHM, a professor and lead author of the study, said, “Although only a hypothesis, the suggestion that it might be better rather than worse to transfuse patients who are only mildly anemic goes against the evidence about when to transfuse in non-cardiac surgery settings. Transfusing more rather than fewer patients would create a challenge for hospitals. With an aging population and possibly an increase in heart disease, obesity and diabetes, it can only become more difficult in the future to maintain the national blood supply in the UK and in other developed countries around the world. Our findings emphasize the importance of interventions to reduce blood loss in the first place.” The study was published on March 12, 2015, in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

Related Links:

University of Bristol
Nuffield Department of Population Health



New
Gold Member
Hematology Analyzer
Medonic M32B
POC Helicobacter Pylori Test Kit
Hepy Urease Test
New
Autoimmune Liver Diseases Assay
Microblot-Array Liver Profile Kit
New
Anterior Nasal Specimen Collection Swabs
53-1195-TFS, 53-0100-TFS, 53-0101-TFS, 53-4582-TFS
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Immunology

view channel
Image: The test could streamline clinical decision-making by identifying ideal candidates for immunotherapy upfront (Xiao, Y. et al. Cancer Biology & Medicine July 2025, 20250038)

Blood Test Predicts Immunotherapy Efficacy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype lacking targeted therapies, making immunotherapy a promising yet unpredictable option. Current biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression or tumor... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: New diagnostics could predict a woman’s risk of a common sexually transmitted infection (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

New Markers Could Predict Risk of Severe Chlamydia Infection

Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can cause pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and other reproductive complications when it spreads to the upper genital tract.... Read more

Pathology

view channel
image: Researchers Marco Gustav (right) and MD Nic G. Reitsam (left) discuss the study data (Photo courtesy of Anja Stübner/EKFZ)

AI Model Simultaneously Detects Multiple Genetic Colorectal Cancer Markers in Tissue Samples

Colorectal cancer is a complex disease influenced by multiple genetic alterations. Traditionally, studies and diagnostic tools have focused on predicting only one mutation at a time, overlooking the interplay... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.