Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Lab-Developed Tests Compared with Approved Diagnostics

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 30 Jan 2018
The debate about the role of the government-approved diagnostics in the regulation of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) has focused attention on the analytical performance of all clinical laboratory testing.

This is particularly important when it comes to detecting common types of cancer mutations such as the B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) oncology analytes.

A team of scientists from different institutions and led by those at (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA) compared the performance of LDTs and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Silver Springs, MD, USA) approved companion diagnostics (FDA-CDs), in proficiency testing (PT) provided by the College of American Pathologists Molecular Oncology Committee (CAP, Northfield, IL, USA). More...
The team analyzed the performance of 6,897 tests from laboratories participating in the CAP Proficiency Testing (PT) for BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS, oncology analytes used often by both LDTs and FDA-CDxs. A total of 6,897 PT responses were included: BRAF (n = 2,524; 14 PT samples), EGFR (n = 2,216; 11 PT samples), and KRAS (n = 2,157, 10 PT samples). FDA ompanion diagnostics and LDTs are compared for both accuracy and preanalytic practices of the laboratories.

Using CAP standards, they compared accuracy and preanalytic practices of the laboratories and found that both types of tests exceeded 97% accuracy across the three cancer genes. In another important finding, the scientists discovered that at least 60% of the participating laboratories had adapted an FDA-CDx test to the point that it changed the classification to an LDT. According to the specialists, laboratories did this to “allow for a greater breadth of sample types, minimum tumor content, and instrumentation.” From a regulatory perspective, the data suggest that there’s not as much of a difference between FDA-CDxs and LDTs as previously thought. The high marks on LDT proficiency are significant, given the scrutiny these tests have experienced over their reliability. FDA for some time has advocated for increased oversight of LDTs, claiming that they should be regulated as medical devices.

Annette S. Kim, MD, PhD, an associate pathologist and first author of the study, said, “These modifications appear to be driven by the exigencies of real day-to-day clinical practice that requires altering the assays to meet the needs of a variety of clinical situations that may not be accommodated by the FDA-approved protocol.” The study was published originally published online on December 14, 2017, in the journal JAMA Oncology.

Related Links:
Brigham and Women's Hospital
US Food and Drug Administration
College of American Pathologists

New
Gold Member
Automatic Hematology Analyzer
DH-800 Series
Collection and Transport System
PurSafe Plus®
New
Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Analyzer
MS-i3080
New
6 Part Hematology Analyzer with RET + IPF
Mispa HX 88
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: Over 100 new epigenetic biomarkers may help predict cardiovascular disease risk (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Routine Blood Draws Could Detect Epigenetic Biomarkers for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, yet predicting individual risk remains a persistent challenge. Traditional risk factors, while useful, do not fully capture biological changes... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: New research points to protecting blood during radiation therapy (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Pioneering Model Measures Radiation Exposure in Blood for Precise Cancer Treatments

Scientists have long focused on protecting organs near tumors during radiotherapy, but blood — a vital, circulating tissue — has largely been excluded from dose calculations. Each blood cell passing through... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: The VENTANA HER2 (4B5) test is now CE-IVDR approved (Photo courtesy of Roche)

Companion Diagnostic Test Identifies HER2-Ultralow Breast Cancer and Biliary Tract Cancer Patients

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Europe, with more than 564,000 new cases and 145,000 deaths annually. Metastatic breast cancer is rising in younger populations and remains the leading cause... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: Conceptual design of the CORAL capsule for microbial sampling in the small intestine (H. Mohammed et al., Device (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.device.2025.100904)

Coral-Inspired Capsule Samples Hidden Bacteria from Small Intestine

The gut microbiome has been linked to conditions ranging from immune disorders to mental health, yet conventional stool tests often fail to capture bacterial populations in the small intestine.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.