We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES

Download Mobile App




Rapid Immunoassay Shows Potential for Lyme Disease Diagnosis

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 28 Oct 2019
Print article
Image: In this photomicrograph, the spiral-shaped bacteria that cause Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, have been illuminated using red and green fluorescent antibodies (Photo courtesy of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
Image: In this photomicrograph, the spiral-shaped bacteria that cause Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, have been illuminated using red and green fluorescent antibodies (Photo courtesy of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
A three-antigen-based immunoassay for diagnosis of Lyme disease has the potential to be developed for point-of-care use.

Lyme disease, which is caused by the spiral-shaped bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, may be difficult to diagnose, as it causes a wide range of symptoms, from fever and rash to neurologic and cardiac symptoms and joint pain.

The most widely used method for Lyme diagnosis is testing for antibodies in the blood by ELISA and Western blot. A two-tiered protocol is recommended by the [U.S.] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): the sensitive ELISA test is performed first, and if it is positive or equivocal, then the more specific Western blot is run. However, the reliability of the CDC two-tiered protocol is controversial.

Studies have shown that the Western blot IgM has a specificity of 94–96% for individuals with clinical symptoms of early Lyme disease. The initial ELISA test has a sensitivity of about 70%, and in two-tiered testing, the overall sensitivity is only 64%, although this rises to 100% in the subset of people with disseminated symptoms, such as arthritis. Erroneous test results have been widely reported in both early and late stages of the disease, and can be caused by several factors, including antibody cross-reactions from other infections, including Epstein–Barr virus and cytomegalovirus, as well as herpes simplex virus.

As an alternative to the two-tiered protocol, investigators at NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Bethesda, MD, USA) and collaborators at several institutions including Columbia University (New York, NY, USA) and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (Memphis, USA) developed a sensitive immunoassay based on three Borrelia burgdorferi antigens.

The investigators used human serum rigorously characterized as acute and convalescent early Lyme disease, Lyme arthritis, and post treatment Lyme disease syndrome, as well as the necessary control samples to select the best of 12 Borrelia burgdorferi proteins to improve their microfluidic assay (mChip-Ld). The operation of mChip is similar to that of ELISA for determining serum antibody concentrations. The mChip contains 10 zones, which detect the passage of a small amount (about one microliter) of blood. The results can be obtained in a color-coded format in about 15 minutes.

The investigators selected three antigens (3Ag) to include in the mChip-Ld: VlsE and a proprietary synthetic 33-mer (repeat units) peptide (PepVF) to capture sensitivity in all disease stages, and OspC for early Lyme disease.

Results revealed that these biomarkers were more effective than those previously used at identifying signs of Lyme disease infection in early stage samples, possibly as these antigens were able to detect antibodies that peaked in the first two to six weeks following infection.

The investigators suggested that their results opened the door for the development of a single, rapid, multiplexed diagnostic test for point-of-care use that could be designed to identify Lyme disease stage.

The study was published in the October 9, 2019, online edition of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Related Links:
NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Columbia University
University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
Complement 3 (C3) Test
GPP-100 C3 Kit
New
Gold Member
TORCH Panel Rapid Test
Rapid TORCH Panel Test

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: The groundbreaking treatment approach has shown promise in hard-to-treat cancers (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Genetic Testing Combined With Personalized Drug Screening On Tumor Samples to Revolutionize Cancer Treatment

Cancer treatment typically adheres to a standard of care—established, statistically validated regimens that are effective for the majority of patients. However, the disease’s inherent variability means... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.