We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES AG

Download Mobile App




Factors Affecting Plasma DNA Analysis Evaluated

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 21 May 2018
Print article
Image: The RainDrop digital PCR system (Photo courtesy of RainDance Technologies).
Image: The RainDrop digital PCR system (Photo courtesy of RainDance Technologies).
There is vast potential in precision-medicine methods of both detecting and monitoring disease by looking for indications of cancer mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating in the blood. However, there are many factors that can significantly alter these samples as they are collected and analyzed.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis relies on detection and quantification of these mutations, against a background of cfDNA contributed by peripheral blood cells and other tissues. Total cfDNA and tumor-specific ctDNA levels in plasma vary considerably across cancer patients, cancer types and disease stages as well as during longitudinal follow-up of each patient.

Scientists from the Translational Genomics Research Institute (Phoenix, AZ, USA) designed a multiplexed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay targeting nine single copy genomic loci. They prepared digital PCR reactions and performed thermocycling using DNA Engine Tetrad 2 and they measured droplet fluorescence using RainDrop Digital PCR Sense Instrument and analyzed results using accompanying software. To evaluate whether their ddPCR assay performed as expected, they analyzed known quantities of sheared DNA fragments with predetermined size and compared the results with expected theoretical yields.

Healthy volunteer and clinical plasma samples included in comparison of immediately processed and archived samples were collected. Samples from seven independent clinical cohorts were included in this analysis, including patients diagnosed with melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma and rectal cancer as well as healthy volunteers. For assessment of sequencing performance guided by ddPCR results, the team quantified cfDNA from commercially obtained control plasma samples using ddPCR and prepared whole genome sequencing libraries using ThruPLEX DNA-Seq.

The scientists evaluated effects of DNA extraction methods and blood collection tubes on cfDNA yield and fragment size, and developed a multiplexed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay with five short and four long amplicons targeting single copy genomic loci. Using this assay, they compared seven cfDNA extraction kits and found cfDNA yield and fragment size vary significantly. They also compared three blood collection protocols using plasma samples from 23 healthy volunteers (EDTA tubes processed within one hour and Cell-free DNA Blood Collection Tubes processed within 24 and 72 hours) and found no significant differences in cfDNA yield, fragment size and background noise between these protocols. In 219 clinical samples, cfDNA fragments were shorter in plasma samples processed immediately after venipuncture compared to archived samples, suggesting contribution of background DNA by lysed peripheral blood cells.

Muhammed Murtaza, MD, PhD, the senior author of the study, said, “In order for us to rely on sequencing results and evidence of cancer mutations from these samples and to make valid recommendations for treating physicians, we must ensure they have been collected and processed appropriately. We developed this new quality-control assay to ensure we can confirm reliability using a very small volume of a patient’s blood sample.” The study was published on May 9, 2018, in the journal Scientific Reports.

Related Links:
Translational Genomics Research Institute

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
One Step HbA1c Measuring System
GREENCARE A1c
Complement 3 (C3) Test
GPP-100 C3 Kit
Gold Member
Xylazine Immunoassay Test
Xylazine ELISA

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The Gazelle Hb Variant Test (Photo courtesy of Hemex Health)

First Affordable and Rapid Test for Beta Thalassemia Demonstrates 99% Diagnostic Accuracy

Hemoglobin disorders rank as some of the most prevalent monogenic diseases globally. Among various hemoglobin disorders, beta thalassemia, a hereditary blood disorder, affects about 1.5% of the world's... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The new platform is designed to perform blood-based diagnoses of nontuberculosis mycobacteria (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours

Breathing in nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is a common experience for many people. These bacteria are present in water systems, soil, and dust all over the world and usually don't cause any problems.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: These new assays are being developed for use on the recently introduced DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer (Photo courtesy of Beckman Coulter)

Beckman Coulter and Fujirebio Expand Partnership on Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnostics

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics (Brea, CA, USA) and Fujirebio Diagnostics (Tokyo, Japan) have expanded their partnership focused on the development, manufacturing and clinical adoption of neurodegenerative... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.