We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES AG

Download Mobile App




Multiplex Assay Enhances Prostate Cancer Test

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 25 May 2011
A blood test has been initiated that is more sensitive and specific than the standard Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) test. More...


The novel test, known as the A+PSA assay, looked simultaneously for PSA and antibodies to the six prostate-cancer associated antigens in a single reaction test done in a laboratory, similar to the mode by which PSA is measured.

Scientists at the Jonsson Cancer Center (UCLA; University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA) used blood taken before surgery from 131 patients from UCLA, Japan and France with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancers and compared results to blood taken from 121 men with either benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or prostatitis, an infection or inflammation of the prostate that increases PSA levels. The assay was designed to assess antibodies in the serum against six specific prostate-cancer associated antigens. The peptide epitopes utilized were from the following: cancer/testis antigen 1B, (NY-ESO-1); X antigen family, member 1B, (XAGE-1b); synovial sarcoma X2, (SSX-2, 4); as well as prostate cancer overexpressed antigen alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR); p90 autoantigen; and lens epithelium derived growth factor, (LEDGF). These epitopes were conjugated with seroMAP microspheres, (Luminex Corporation, Austin TX, USA), to allow multiplex measurement of autoantibodies present in serum samples.

The multiplex assay was more sensitive that the standard PSA test as the percentage of men with prostate cancer who were correctly identified as having a malignancy was 79% compared to the 52% found in PSA testing. The percentage of healthy men who were correctly identified as not having prostate cancer was 84% compared to the 79% found when testing for PSA alone. The rate of false positives using conventional PSA testing was 21%, while with the A+PSA assay, the false-positive rate was 16%.

Gang Zeng, PhD, a senior author of the study, said, "Different men may have different levels of the six antibodies or different antibodies all together based on their race, age, and ethnicity." The team intends to conduct a prospective study that would include the racial, ethnic and age information for each man who provides blood. The test could perhaps be altered for men over a certain age if the antibody levels found in their blood vary. African-American men may also have varying levels of the six antibodies. There also are additional antibodies that could be added to the assay that may improve both the sensitivity and specificity of the test. The study was published on April 19, 2011 in the Journal of Translational Medicine.

Related Links:
Jonsson Cancer Center
Luminex Corporation



Platinum Member
Automated Coagulation Analyzer
Hemolumi H6
Gold Member
Electrolyte Analyzer
CBS-4000 (CBS-400)
Platinum Member
Integrated Biochemical & Immunological System
Biolumi CX Solution X10+C10
New
Gastrointestinal Panel
Xpert® GI Panel
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: Signatera uses ctDNA analysis to identify residual tumor-derived genetic material after definitive treatment (image credit: Adobe Stock)

Blood-Based MRD Test Predicts Recurrence Risk After Lung Cancer Surgery

Assessing recurrence risk after surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer remains challenging, complicating adjuvant therapy and surveillance decisions. Blood-based molecular residual disease... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Although many people harbor latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), growing evidence has linked the virus to MS pathobiology (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

Blood EBV Activity Biomarkers May Predict Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Months Ahead

Predicting relapse in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains difficult, limiting opportunities for timely intervention and monitoring. Although many people harbor latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), growing evidence... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: Type 1 diabetes affects more than 9 million people worldwide and can begin years before symptoms appear, making early identification of at-risk children difficult (Image Credit: iStock)

Early-Life Gut Microbiome Changes May Help Assess Type 1 Diabetes Risk

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) affects more than 9 million people worldwide, including 1.8 million children and adolescents, and often begins years before symptoms appear. Early identification of children who are... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: A new study demonstrates that vascular features in colorectal tumors could serve as prognostic biomarkers of disease outcome. (Image Credit: iStock)

Tumor Blood Vessel Features May Help Predict Colorectal Cancer Survival

Colorectal cancer outcomes vary widely, and tumor biology remains a key determinant of prognosis. Because neoplasms depend on a vascular supply, differences in intratumoral vessels may influence survival.... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: ADLM recommends that emerging AI tools follow the same professional oversight, quality, validation, and monitoring standards as traditional clinical testing within CLIA’s existing framework (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

ADLM Calls for CLIA Updates to Support Safe AI Use in Laboratory Medicine

Clinical laboratories increasingly use artificial intelligence to verify, interpret, and report results, but safeguards under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) were designed in 1992.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: Central to the collaboration is the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test, a noninvasive blood test authorized in the U.S. to assess disease progression risk in patients with advanced fibrosis due to MASH and support patient management decisions. (Photo courtesy of Siemens Healthineers)

Siemens Healthineers and Novo Collaborate to Expand Access to Noninvasive Liver Testing

Metabolic dysfunction‑associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its progressive form, metabolic dysfunction‑associated steatohepatitis (MASH), affect millions and are linked to obesity, type 2 diabetes,... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.