We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
PURITAN MEDICAL

Download Mobile App




PROPPR Trial Supports Use of Transfusion Protocol Initially Developed for Battlefield Trauma Patients

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 04 Mar 2015
In a groundbreaking multisite prospective clinical trial, the damage control resuscitation (DCR) protocol for massive blood transfusion significantly improved severe trauma patient outcome from hemorrhagic shock, when compared to another commonly used protocol.

DCR, used in most hospitals today, was first developed by a multidisciplinary team of US military trauma surgeons in treating soldiers suffering massive blood loss upon injury in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. More...
Observational studies suggested that DCR (also called balanced transfusion) improves patient outcomes, then in 2012 researchers launched the large “Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios” (PROPPR) clinical trial to better gauge its effects. The study involved 680 severely injured patients treated at 12 Level I trauma centers in the US and Canada.

DCR calls for administration of equal parts (1:1:1 ratio) of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells, simultaneously if possible. DCR was tested against a common similar therapy that uses a 1:1:2 ratio of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells. In a head-to-head comparison of randomly assigned patients (within 8 minutes of arriving at a hospital), significantly more patients in the DCR (1:1:1) group achieved hemostasis and fewer experienced death due to exsanguination by 24 hours. Thereafter, mortality rates in the two groups were about the same up to the trial’s 30 day endpoint. The study also addressed concerns of safety by comparing 23 complications and found no significant differences between the two protocols.

“If I needed a massive blood transfusion, I would want DCR,” said Dr. John B. Holcomb, the study’s principal investigator, director of Acute Care Surgery, University of Texas Health Medical School (Houston, TX, USA), and a retired US Army surgeon who had helped develop DCR: “Bleeding to death is the leading, potentially preventable cause of death in military and civilian trauma patients,” he said.

“This is one of the biggest blood transfusion studies ever,” said Dr. Holcomb, “The network involved hundreds of people across North America including doctors, nurses, and technicians. The hard work they put into this study was phenomenal.”

“The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) has a strong commitment to supporting resuscitation research. We were proud to collaborate with the US Department of Defense and our Canadian colleagues in this important trial focused on long-standing clinical questions for treating severe trauma patients,” said Dr. Gail Pearson, director of Adult and Pediatric Cardiac Research, NHLBI, part of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH).

“This study represents a translation of practice from what has been learned during wartime into civilian practice after scientific evaluation. The lessons learned have definitely changed practice and saved lives. Perhaps, as has been said before, this is the only good thing to come out of war,” said Dr. David Hoyt, of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium and executive director of the American College of Surgeons.

"This study is an important milestone in trauma care," said Prof. Thomas M. Scalea, MD, Physician-in-Chief of the Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center (Baltimore, MD, USA), who was part of the committee that designed and oversaw the study. "This impressive collaboration has the potential to yield immediate benefit for trauma patients," said Prof. E. Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA, vice president for U. Maryland’s Medical Affairs and dean of the School of Medicine.

The PROPPR Randomized Clinical Trial study, by Holcomb JB et al., was published online February 3, 2015, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Related Links:

Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR)



Gold Member
Antipsychotic TDM Assays
Saladax Antipsychotic Assays
3-Part Differential Hematology Analyzer
Swelab Alfa Plus Sampler
New
Silver Member
Quality Control Material
NATtrol Chlamydia trachomatis Positive Control
New
Clostridium Difficile Toxin A+B Combo Card Test
CerTest Clostridium Difficile Toxin A+B
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








DIASOURCE (A Biovendor Company)

Channels

Immunology

view channel
Image: A simple blood test could replace surgical biopsies for early detecion of heart transplant rejection (Photo courtesy of Shutterstock)

Blood Test Detects Organ Rejection in Heart Transplant Patients

Following a heart transplant, patients are required to undergo surgical biopsies so that physicians can assess the possibility of organ rejection. Rejection happens when the recipient’s immune system identifies... Read more

Pathology

view channel
These images illustrate how precision oncology Organ Chips recapitulate individual patients’ responses to chemotherapy (Photo courtesy of Wyss Institute at Harvard University)

Cancer Chip Accurately Predicts Patient-Specific Chemotherapy Response

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), one of the two primary types of esophageal cancer, ranks as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and currently lacks effective targeted therapies.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2025 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.