We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Vicotex

Download Mobile App




Mismatch Repair/Microsatellite Instability Evaluated Using Cytology Effusion Specimens

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 25 Jan 2021
DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status is routinely assessed in colorectal and endometrial carcinoma as a method of cancer prevention, surveillance in patients with Lynch syndrome and their families, and for prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic implications. More...


MMR is a highly conserved process involving the four key genes mutL homologue 1 (MLH1), mutS homologue 2 (MSH2), mutS homologue 6 (MSH6), and postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2), which act to identify and repair mismatched base pairs that may arise during DNA replication. Recent studies have shown that patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair–deficient (dMMR) advanced cancers can benefit from treatment with a immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Medical Scientists at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) identified surgical pathology cases of colorectal and endometrial carcinomas with known MMR/MSI status and matched effusions with available cell blocks (CBs). Cell block sections were evaluated for adequacy and stained with MMR IPOX (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2). Cytological effusion specimens were collected at the institution by using standard techniques, received fresh in the cytology laboratory, and processed within 48 hours and a cell block was prepared according to previously described techniques and a laboratory protocol.

Immunoperoxidase staining for MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was performed on unstained CB sections with the Leica Bond III stainer (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). The team identified 748 cases with MMR/MSI testing on surgical specimens having matched effusions. Of these, 131 cases (17.5%) had an available CB and 53 were deemed adequate for MMR IPOX staining. MMR IPOX results between effusion CBs and surgical pathology specimens were concordant in 45 of 53 (85%), inconclusive in six of 53 (11%), and discordant in two of 53 (4%) cases.

The authors concluded that there was high concordance of MMR IPOX testing between cytological and surgical specimens, with no false-positive and only two false-negative CB results. Limited tumor cells, staining in cells indefinite as tumor, tumor staining heterogeneity, and lack of internal control staining were problematic in some cases. Their findings indicate that cytological effusion specimens may be suitable substrates for MMR IPOX biomarker testing; however, inconclusive cases need to be interpreted with caution. The study was published in the January 2021 issue of the journal Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

Related Links:
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Leica Biosystems



Platinum Member
Automated Coagulation Analyzer
Hemolumi H6
Gold Member
Fully-auto Specific Protein (Nephelometry) Analyzer
PA240
Urine Analyzer
respons® UDS100
New
Automated Immunoassay Analyzer
SuperFlex™
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to LabMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Clinical Laboratory Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of LabMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of LabMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of LabMedica International in digital format
  • Free LabMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Tracking blood test trends alongside unexplained weight loss may help identify patients at increased cancer risk and support earlier investigation (Image Credit: 123RF)

Blood Test Patterns Improve Cancer Risk Assessment in Primary Care

Unexplained weight loss is a common but nonspecific presentation in primary care that can precede several types of cancer, making referral decisions difficult. Routine blood tests may produce borderline... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The Avantect Pancreatic Cancer Test combines epigenomic, genomic, and glycan biomarkers with machine learning to detect pancreatic cancer-associated signals in blood (Photo courtesy of ClearNote Health)

Multiomic Blood Test Supports Noninvasive Monitoring and Subtyping in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains difficult to detect early and monitor during treatment, particularly in patients with homologous recombination defects. Clinicians also have limited noninvasive... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Although many people harbor latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), growing evidence has linked the virus to MS pathobiology (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

Blood EBV Activity Biomarkers May Predict Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Months Ahead

Predicting relapse in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains difficult, limiting opportunities for timely intervention and monitoring. Although many people harbor latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), growing evidence... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: Graphical Abstract (Jose A. Céspedes, Maria I. Montañez, Isabel M. Jiménez, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles enable clinically relevant in vitro diagnosis of beta-lactam allergy. Materials Today Bio (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103356)

Magnetic Nanoparticles Enable More Sensitive Beta-Lactam Allergy Testing

Penicillin allergy labels are common in clinical practice, yet many are incorrect and can lead to suboptimal antibiotic choices. Although 8%–25% of people report a penicillin allergy, only 1%–10% are truly... Read more

Technology

view channel
Image: ADLM recommends that emerging AI tools follow the same professional oversight, quality, validation, and monitoring standards as traditional clinical testing within CLIA’s existing framework (Image Credit: Adobe Stock)

ADLM Calls for CLIA Updates to Support Safe AI Use in Laboratory Medicine

Clinical laboratories increasingly use artificial intelligence to verify, interpret, and report results, but safeguards under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) were designed in 1992.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image Credit: Adobe Stock

Mayo Clinic and Thermo Fisher Launch Multi-Omics Venture to Identify Early Disease Signals

Many diseases begin developing years before symptoms emerge, making early detection difficult for healthcare systems and clinical laboratories. Linking molecular changes with longitudinal health data could... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.