We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
BIO-RAD LABORATORIES

Download Mobile App




Immune Analysis of Biopsies Predicts Response to Melanoma Immunotherapy

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 01 Sep 2016
Print article
Image: A malignant melanoma on a patient’s skin (Photo courtesy of the National Cancer Institute).
Image: A malignant melanoma on a patient’s skin (Photo courtesy of the National Cancer Institute).
Immune response measured in tumor biopsies during the course of early treatment predicts which melanoma patients will benefit from specific immune checkpoint blockade drugs.

Immune checkpoint blockade represents a major breakthrough in cancer therapy; however, responses are not universal. Genomic and immune features in pretreatment tumor biopsies have been reported to correlate with response in patients with melanoma and other cancers, but robust biomarkers have not been identified.

A large team of scientists at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) assembled a cohort of longitudinal tumor samples from patients and analyzed each biopsy for gene expression and the presence of certain types of T cell and protein markers such as expression of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1, the ligand found on tumor and other cells that activates PD-1. They studied a cohort of 53 patients with metastatic melanoma initially treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) blockade followed by 46 patients treated with PD-1 blockade at progression and analyzed immune signatures in longitudinal tissue samples collected at multiple time points during therapy.

Patients were treated with the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab followed by biopsies, when feasible, after the second or third treatment and at progression. Seven (13%) of 53 patients had a clinical benefit, defined as either absence of disease, tumor shrinkage or stable disease for at least six months. There were no immune biomarker differences between responders and non-responders before treatment. After treatment began, the presence of killer T cells was significantly higher in the tumors of responders. The remaining 46 patients proceeded to treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor pembroluzimab and 13 (28%) of the 46 responded. Before treatment, three immune markers were slightly elevated in responders compared to non-responders, but values overlapped the two groups.

As with the immune profiling, the gene expression panel turned up significant differences between responders and non-responders only at the on-treatment biopsy for anti-PD1. Significant differences were found in 411 differentially expressed genes in responders. Most differences involved increased expression in the responding patients of genes involved in immune response. Only six genes were lower in responders, including the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA), which is involved in the generation of new blood vessels, or angiogenesis.

Jennifer A. Wargo, MD, an associate professor of Genomic Medicine and Surgical Oncology and the senior author of the study, said, “Before treatment, analyzing samples with a 12-marker immune panel or a 795-gene expression panel, you can't tell who will respond with any degree of certainty. On treatment, there were night-and-day differences between responders and non-responders. Therefore we could start by treating with anti-PD1, do an early on-treatment biopsy and, based on that, either continue or add ipilimumab or another agent.” The study was published on August 1, 2016, in the journal Cancer Discovery.

Related Links:
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Test
GPP-100 Anti-CCP Kit
Gold Member
Systemic Autoimmune Testing Assay
BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen with MDSS

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: Microscope image showing human colorectal cancer tumor with Fusobacterium nucleatum stained in a red-purple color (Photo courtesy of Fred Hutch Cancer Center)

Mouth Bacteria Test Could Predict Colon Cancer Progression

Colon cancer, a relatively common but challenging disease to diagnose, requires confirmation through a colonoscopy or surgery. Recently, there has been a worrying increase in colon cancer rates among younger... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: Fingertip blood sample collection on the Babson Handwarmer (Photo courtesy of Babson Diagnostics)

Unique Hand-Warming Technology Supports High-Quality Fingertip Blood Sample Collection

Warming the hand is an effective way to facilitate blood collection from a fingertip, yet off-the-shelf solutions often do not fulfill laboratory requirements. Now, a unique hand-warming technology has... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.