We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
RANDOX LABORATORIES

Download Mobile App




Multiplex Assays Detect HSV-1/2 And Varicella Zoster Virus

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 12 Jan 2015
Print article
Image: Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of the Varicella zoster virus (Photo courtesy of Dr. Erskine Palmer).
Image: Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of the Varicella zoster virus (Photo courtesy of Dr. Erskine Palmer).
The performance of two multiplex real-time polymerase chain reactions (PCR) to individual real-time PCR for the detection of herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, and Varicella zoster virus (VZV) from clinical specimens have been compared.

Viral culture has been considered the gold standard test, although molecular methods have been shown to be more rapid and sensitive and currently, most laboratories perform real-time PCR for the detection of HSV and VZV.

Scientists at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) tested 26,186 samples that were submitted to their laboratory for routine testing by HSV-1/2 real-time PCR analyte-specific reagents (ASR) and/or a VZV laboratory-developed test (LDT) between November 2013 and March 2014. Testing by the routine methods included nucleic acid extraction using the MagNA Pure (Roche; Basel, Switzerland) and analysis on the Roche LightCycler 2.0.

The two multiplex assays that were compared to the routine PCR were the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; Silver Springs, MD, USA)-approved Lyra HSV 1+2/VZV assay (Quidel; San Diego, CA, USA) and the Simplexa HSV-1/2 and VZV combined analyte specific reagents (Focus Diagnostics; Cypress, CA, USA). Samples were also tested by combining the Focus Diagnostics ASRs for HSV 1 + 2 and VZV and testing was then performed on the Focus 3M Integrated Cycler.

The results were compared to a consensus standard, defined as the result obtained by at least two of the three molecular methods. The sensitivity of the Quidel assay ranged from 92.0% for HSV-1 to 97.7% for HSV-2, while the specificity for all targets was 100%. The Focus assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity for all targets, and the percent specificity ranged from 96.8% for HSV-1 to 100% for HSV-2 and VZV.

The authors concluded that for the detection of HSV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the Focus assay showed 100% sensitivity and specificity, while the Quidel HSV-2 method exhibited a sensitivity of 87.5% (7/8) and specificity of 100% (18/18). Future studies evaluating a larger number of CSF samples are needed to better define the performance of these tests. Multiplex assays for HSV-1/2 and VZV offer a promising option for clinical laboratories seeking to reduce hands-on and turnaround times. The study was published online in the January issue of the journal Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease.

Related Links:

Mayo Clinic
Roche 
Quidel


Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG
POCT Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer
FIA Go
Gold Member
Xylazine Immunoassay Test
Xylazine ELISA

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: The 3D printed miniature ionizer is a key component of a mass spectrometer (Photo courtesy of MIT)

3D Printed Point-Of-Care Mass Spectrometer Outperforms State-Of-The-Art Models

Mass spectrometry is a precise technique for identifying the chemical components of a sample and has significant potential for monitoring chronic illness health states, such as measuring hormone levels... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: A blood test could predict lung cancer risk more accurately and reduce the number of required scans (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

Blood Test Accurately Predicts Lung Cancer Risk and Reduces Need for Scans

Lung cancer is extremely hard to detect early due to the limitations of current screening technologies, which are costly, sometimes inaccurate, and less commonly endorsed by healthcare professionals compared... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The CAPILLARYS 3 DBS devices have received U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance (Photo courtesy of Sebia)

Next Generation Instrument Screens for Hemoglobin Disorders in Newborns

Hemoglobinopathies, the most widespread inherited conditions globally, affect about 7% of the population as carriers, with 2.7% of newborns being born with these conditions. The spectrum of clinical manifestations... Read more

Immunology

view channel
Image: Exosomes can be a promising biomarker for cellular rejection after organ transplant (Photo courtesy of Nicolas Primola/Shutterstock)

Diagnostic Blood Test for Cellular Rejection after Organ Transplant Could Replace Surgical Biopsies

Transplanted organs constantly face the risk of being rejected by the recipient's immune system which differentiates self from non-self using T cells and B cells. T cells are commonly associated with acute... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: The QIAseq xHYB Mycobacterium tuberculosis Panel uses next-generation sequencing (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

New Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Panel to Support Real-Time Surveillance and Combat Antimicrobial Resistance

Tuberculosis (TB), the leading cause of death from an infectious disease globally, is a contagious bacterial infection that primarily spreads through the coughing of patients with active pulmonary TB.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.