We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us


Beckman Coulter develops, manufactures and markets laboratory systems, reagents, centrifugation, lab automation, elec... read more Featured Products: More products

Download Mobile App


ATTENTION: Due to the COVID-19 PANDEMIC, many events are being rescheduled for a later date, converted into virtual venues, or altogether cancelled. Please check with the event organizer or website prior to planning for any forthcoming event.
24 Jan 2022 - 27 Jan 2022

Three Automated Urine Analyzers Compared with Manual Microscopic Urinalysis

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 03 Mar 2021
Print article
Image: The iRICELL series combines urine chemistry and microscopy in a fully automated, walk-away workcell that is easy to use and maintain and optimizes and advances urinalysis and body fluid testing (Photo courtesy of Beckman Coulter).
Image: The iRICELL series combines urine chemistry and microscopy in a fully automated, walk-away workcell that is easy to use and maintain and optimizes and advances urinalysis and body fluid testing (Photo courtesy of Beckman Coulter).
Urinalysis is an essential screening test in clinical laboratories in order to diagnose and plan treatment for urinary tract infections, kidney disease and diabetes. Urinalysis includes visual examination, evaluation of chemical parameters and microscopic examination.

Microscopic examination is fundamental to urine analysis. This is a simple way to collect informative data, but it is also labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires experienced staff for accurate results and interpretation. Several automated urine analyzers have been introduced for urine analysis in medical laboratories.

Clinical Medical Laboratorians at the Prince of Songkla University (Songkhla, Thailand) collected fresh 100 urine samples in preservative-free containers and transferred to four different test tubes for three automated urine analyzers without centrifuging and manual microscopy by three experienced medical technologists, independently using the same microscope slide.

The scientists assessed and compared the performance of the most common three automated urine analyzers: Cobas 6500 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA); UN3000-111b (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan); and iRICELL 3000 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The Cobas 6500 is a combination of two analyzers including the Cobas u601 which analyzes physical and chemical components, and the Cobas u701 which performs microscopic examinations. The UN3000-111b has two component analyzers in a single platform including a chemical component (UC-3500 analyzer) for analyzing the physical and chemical parts of urine and a fluorescence flow cytometry component (UF-5000 analyzer) for microscopic examination of sediments. The iRICELL 3000 is a combination of two component analyzers including a chemical component (iChemVELOCITY) and a microscopic examination component (iQ200).

The medical laboratorians reported that there was good correlation of urine physical and chemical analyses between the three analyzers with an overall concordance level of more than 80%. For sediment analysis, the degree of concordance between manual analysis and the three instruments was very good to good for white blood cells, red blood cells and epithelial cells, and moderate for bacteria. There were fair to good agreements between manual microscopy and the three instruments, Cobas 6500, UN3000-111b and iRICELL 3000, for casts (Cohen’s kappa 0.42, 0.38 and 0.62, respectively).

The authors concluded that the three automated urine analyzers showed similar performances and good correlation with manual microscopy. The results of this study indicate that automated urine analyzers could be used for initial urine testing to reduce high workloads and to save time, but manual microscopic analysis by experienced staff is still necessary to classify urine sediments for confirmation, especially in pathologic specimens. The study was published in the March, 2021 issue of the journal Practical Laboratory Medicine.

Related Links:
Prince of Songkla University
Roche Diagnostics
Sysmex Corporation
Beckman Coulter

Gold Supplier
Molecular Diagnostic System
POC Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
Urine Analyzer
ComboStik R-50
Benchtop Centrifuge
ROTOFIX 46 | 46 H

Print article
IIR Middle East


Molecular Diagnostics

view channel

Point-of-Care Lateral Flow Test Detects Bladder Cancer Using Urine Sample within Minutes

A breakthrough diagnostics platform uses a multiplexed lateral flow assay that detects 10 bladder cancer biomarkers from a urine sample in either laboratory or point-of-care settings. SCIENION (Berlin,... Read more


view channel
Image: Bone marrow aspirate from a patient with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Blasts are the predominant population and have a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and generally lack granules. (Photo courtesy of Professor Peter G. Maslak, MD)

Cord Blood and Matched Related Donor Transplantation Compared in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The prognosis of primary refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia is poor, with a five-year overall survival of less than 10%. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only... Read more


view channel

Global Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA) Market to Surpass USD 4 Billion by 2028 Due to Growing Burden of Infectious Diseases

The global immunofluorescence assay (IFA) market is expected to reach USD 4.01 billion by 2028, driven by the increasing global healthcare burden of chronic and infectious diseases, rising application... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2022 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.