We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
LGC Clinical Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Events

09 Apr 2024 - 12 Apr 2024
15 Apr 2024 - 17 Apr 2024
23 Apr 2024 - 26 Apr 2024

Rapid Immunoassay Shows Potential for Lyme Disease Diagnosis

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 28 Oct 2019
Print article
Image: In this photomicrograph, the spiral-shaped bacteria that cause Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, have been illuminated using red and green fluorescent antibodies (Photo courtesy of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
Image: In this photomicrograph, the spiral-shaped bacteria that cause Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi, have been illuminated using red and green fluorescent antibodies (Photo courtesy of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).
A three-antigen-based immunoassay for diagnosis of Lyme disease has the potential to be developed for point-of-care use.

Lyme disease, which is caused by the spiral-shaped bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, may be difficult to diagnose, as it causes a wide range of symptoms, from fever and rash to neurologic and cardiac symptoms and joint pain.

The most widely used method for Lyme diagnosis is testing for antibodies in the blood by ELISA and Western blot. A two-tiered protocol is recommended by the [U.S.] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): the sensitive ELISA test is performed first, and if it is positive or equivocal, then the more specific Western blot is run. However, the reliability of the CDC two-tiered protocol is controversial.

Studies have shown that the Western blot IgM has a specificity of 94–96% for individuals with clinical symptoms of early Lyme disease. The initial ELISA test has a sensitivity of about 70%, and in two-tiered testing, the overall sensitivity is only 64%, although this rises to 100% in the subset of people with disseminated symptoms, such as arthritis. Erroneous test results have been widely reported in both early and late stages of the disease, and can be caused by several factors, including antibody cross-reactions from other infections, including Epstein–Barr virus and cytomegalovirus, as well as herpes simplex virus.

As an alternative to the two-tiered protocol, investigators at NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Bethesda, MD, USA) and collaborators at several institutions including Columbia University (New York, NY, USA) and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (Memphis, USA) developed a sensitive immunoassay based on three Borrelia burgdorferi antigens.

The investigators used human serum rigorously characterized as acute and convalescent early Lyme disease, Lyme arthritis, and post treatment Lyme disease syndrome, as well as the necessary control samples to select the best of 12 Borrelia burgdorferi proteins to improve their microfluidic assay (mChip-Ld). The operation of mChip is similar to that of ELISA for determining serum antibody concentrations. The mChip contains 10 zones, which detect the passage of a small amount (about one microliter) of blood. The results can be obtained in a color-coded format in about 15 minutes.

The investigators selected three antigens (3Ag) to include in the mChip-Ld: VlsE and a proprietary synthetic 33-mer (repeat units) peptide (PepVF) to capture sensitivity in all disease stages, and OspC for early Lyme disease.

Results revealed that these biomarkers were more effective than those previously used at identifying signs of Lyme disease infection in early stage samples, possibly as these antigens were able to detect antibodies that peaked in the first two to six weeks following infection.

The investigators suggested that their results opened the door for the development of a single, rapid, multiplexed diagnostic test for point-of-care use that could be designed to identify Lyme disease stage.

The study was published in the October 9, 2019, online edition of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Related Links:
NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Columbia University
University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Specimen Collection & Transport
POCT Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer
FIA Go
New
Gold Member
Magnetic Bead Separation Modules
MAG and HEATMAG

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The low-cost portable device rapidly identifies chemotherapy patients at risk of sepsis (Photo courtesy of 52North Health)

POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Neutropenia, a decrease in neutrophils (a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infections), is a frequent side effect of certain cancer treatments. This condition elevates the risk of infections,... Read more

Pathology

view channel
Image: The OvaCis Rapid Test discriminates benign from malignant epithelial ovarian cysts (Photo courtesy of INEX)

Intra-Operative POC Device Distinguishes Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Cysts within 15 Minutes

Ovarian cysts represent a significant health issue for women globally, with up to 10% experiencing this condition at some point in their lives. These cysts form when fluid collects within a thin membrane... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.