We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
LGC Clinical Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Lab-Developed Tests Compared with Approved Diagnostics

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 30 Jan 2018
Print article
Image: The FDA-approved BRACAnalysis CDx test as a companion diagnostic (Photo courtesy of Myriad Genetics).
Image: The FDA-approved BRACAnalysis CDx test as a companion diagnostic (Photo courtesy of Myriad Genetics).
The debate about the role of the government-approved diagnostics in the regulation of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) has focused attention on the analytical performance of all clinical laboratory testing.

This is particularly important when it comes to detecting common types of cancer mutations such as the B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) oncology analytes.

A team of scientists from different institutions and led by those at (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA) compared the performance of LDTs and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Silver Springs, MD, USA) approved companion diagnostics (FDA-CDs), in proficiency testing (PT) provided by the College of American Pathologists Molecular Oncology Committee (CAP, Northfield, IL, USA). The team analyzed the performance of 6,897 tests from laboratories participating in the CAP Proficiency Testing (PT) for BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS, oncology analytes used often by both LDTs and FDA-CDxs. A total of 6,897 PT responses were included: BRAF (n = 2,524; 14 PT samples), EGFR (n = 2,216; 11 PT samples), and KRAS (n = 2,157, 10 PT samples). FDA ompanion diagnostics and LDTs are compared for both accuracy and preanalytic practices of the laboratories.

Using CAP standards, they compared accuracy and preanalytic practices of the laboratories and found that both types of tests exceeded 97% accuracy across the three cancer genes. In another important finding, the scientists discovered that at least 60% of the participating laboratories had adapted an FDA-CDx test to the point that it changed the classification to an LDT. According to the specialists, laboratories did this to “allow for a greater breadth of sample types, minimum tumor content, and instrumentation.” From a regulatory perspective, the data suggest that there’s not as much of a difference between FDA-CDxs and LDTs as previously thought. The high marks on LDT proficiency are significant, given the scrutiny these tests have experienced over their reliability. FDA for some time has advocated for increased oversight of LDTs, claiming that they should be regulated as medical devices.

Annette S. Kim, MD, PhD, an associate pathologist and first author of the study, said, “These modifications appear to be driven by the exigencies of real day-to-day clinical practice that requires altering the assays to meet the needs of a variety of clinical situations that may not be accommodated by the FDA-approved protocol.” The study was published originally published online on December 14, 2017, in the journal JAMA Oncology.

Related Links:
Brigham and Women's Hospital
US Food and Drug Administration
College of American Pathologists
Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Specimen Collection & Transport
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Test
GPP-100 Anti-CCP Kit
Gold Member
Real-time PCR System
GentierX3 Series

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: The study showed the blood-based cancer screening test detects 83% of people with colorectal cancer with specificity of 90% (Photo courtesy of Guardant Health)

Blood Test Shows 83% Accuracy for Detecting Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second biggest cause of cancer deaths among adults in the U.S., with forecasts suggesting 53,010 people might die from it in 2024. While fewer older adults are dying from this... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The Gazelle Hb Variant Test (Photo courtesy of Hemex Health)

First Affordable and Rapid Test for Beta Thalassemia Demonstrates 99% Diagnostic Accuracy

Hemoglobin disorders rank as some of the most prevalent monogenic diseases globally. Among various hemoglobin disorders, beta thalassemia, a hereditary blood disorder, affects about 1.5% of the world's... Read more

Microbiology

view channel
Image: The new platform is designed to perform blood-based diagnoses of nontuberculosis mycobacteria (Photo courtesy of 123RF)

New Blood Test Cuts Diagnosis Time for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections from Months to Hours

Breathing in nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is a common experience for many people. These bacteria are present in water systems, soil, and dust all over the world and usually don't cause any problems.... Read more

Industry

view channel
Image: These new assays are being developed for use on the recently introduced DxI 9000 Immunoassay Analyzer (Photo courtesy of Beckman Coulter)

Beckman Coulter and Fujirebio Expand Partnership on Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnostics

Beckman Coulter Diagnostics (Brea, CA, USA) and Fujirebio Diagnostics (Tokyo, Japan) have expanded their partnership focused on the development, manufacturing and clinical adoption of neurodegenerative... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.