We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
INTEGRA BIOSCIENCES AG

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES

Provides full range of instrumentation, reagent kits, software and quality control systems to clinical laboratories. ... read more Featured Products: More products

Download Mobile App




Events

09 Apr 2024 - 12 Apr 2024
15 Apr 2024 - 17 Apr 2024
23 Apr 2024 - 26 Apr 2024

Blood Test Detects New Breast Cancer Subtype

By LabMedica International staff writers
Posted on 14 Sep 2016
Print article
Image: The QX200 Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain reaction  (ddPCR) system (Photo courtesy of Bio-Rad).
Image: The QX200 Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain reaction (ddPCR) system (Photo courtesy of Bio-Rad).
A blood test has been developed that detects when the most common form of breast cancer has become resistant to treatment could double the average time it takes for the disease to progress, from around two and a half to around six months.

The test detects mutations to a gene called estrogen receptor 1, or ESR1, which indicate that receptors for the female hormone estrogen in the cancer cells that are usually driven by the hormone have evolved to stay permanently switched on without it which means hormonal treatments that block estrogen production will no longer be effective.

Scientists at the Institute of Cancer Research (London, UK) and their colleagues analyzed blood samples from a total of 783 women enrolled on two major phase III clinical trials of new treatments for advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, which accounts for three quarters of all cases. DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Total free DNA was quantified from plasma using RNase P as the reference gene. For ESR1 mutation analysis, the team used commercially available multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assays for the seven most common ESR1 mutations. The ddPCR was performed on a QX200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A multiplex assay was considered mutation positive if at least two ESR1 mutant droplets were observed. The results obtained on the multiplex ddPCR were further characterized using uniplex ddPCR assays.

The investigators found that nearly 40% of the 162 patient blood samples available, taken going into the trial, were found to have mutations in the estrogen receptor. These women responded better to fulvestrant, which delayed progression of the disease for 5.7 months, compared to 2.6 months on exemestane. For women without ESR1 mutations both treatments, fulvestrant and exemestane, had the same effectiveness.

The scientists also looked at a second trial that had compared treatment with fulvestrant and a placebo to fulvestrant and palbociclib. They found 25.3 %of patient blood samples had estrogen receptor mutations going into this trial. But because palbociclib targets different molecules, the patients had the same outcomes regardless of whether or not they had the mutation in the estrogen receptor.

Nicholas Turner, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and team leader said, “Our results show that breast cancer with and without ESR1 mutations are distinct subtypes that respond differently to treatment. These subtypes can be diagnosed simply and cheaply from a blood test, and should be considered for future clinical trials of advanced breast cancer to ensure patients are receiving the best treatment for their cancer. For the first time we should able to use a potentially simple test to help us pick the best treatment for women with advanced cancer after their initial treatment has failed. We do need to confirm the results in another trial before we can implement this clinically.” The study was published on September 1, 2016, in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Related Links:
Institute of Cancer Research
Qiagen
Bio-Rad
Platinum Member
COVID-19 Rapid Test
OSOM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
One Step HbA1c Measuring System
GREENCARE A1c
POCT Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer
FIA Go
New
Gold Member
Plasma Control
Plasma Control Level 1

Print article

Channels

Clinical Chemistry

view channel
Image: Reaching speeds up to 6,000 RPM, this centrifuge forms the basis for a new type of inexpensive, POC biomedical test (Photo courtesy of Duke University)

POC Biomedical Test Spins Water Droplet Using Sound Waves for Cancer Detection

Exosomes, tiny cellular bioparticles carrying a specific set of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, play a crucial role in cell communication and hold promise for non-invasive diagnostics.... Read more

Molecular Diagnostics

view channel
Image: MOF materials efficiently enrich cfDNA and cfRNA in blood through simple operational process (Photo courtesy of Science China Press)

Blood Circulating Nucleic Acid Enrichment Technique Enables Non-Invasive Liver Cancer Diagnosis

The ability to diagnose diseases early can significantly enhance the effectiveness of clinical treatments and improve survival rates. One promising approach for non-invasive early diagnosis is the use... Read more

Hematology

view channel
Image: The low-cost portable device rapidly identifies chemotherapy patients at risk of sepsis (Photo courtesy of 52North Health)

POC Finger-Prick Blood Test Determines Risk of Neutropenic Sepsis in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Neutropenia, a decrease in neutrophils (a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infections), is a frequent side effect of certain cancer treatments. This condition elevates the risk of infections,... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.